Abstract
Background Community-based organizations (CBOs) are critical in providing trusted and targeted HIV/STI services to gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM). Despite significant strides in CBOs’ involvement in HIV/STI research, there remain gaps in meaningful engagement, especially in quantitative research. This paper explores the development of HEKA, a community-led research platform where community-based organizations build capacity and leverage routinely collected program data to design research that aims to improve HIV/STI programs. We share a collective reflection on the lessons learned in the process, the challenges that emerged, and recommendations for facilitating community-based program science.
Methodology Through a collaborative process, seven CBOs serving GBMSM in Kenya created the HEKA Research Initiative and designed a framework of collaboration, through which we assessed the technical gaps in quantitative research among staff, applied for funding, co-designed capacity-building workshops with academic partners, and developed a research agenda. We established a monthly meeting frequency and through collective reflection, documented the lessons and challenges in the process.
Outcomes With our successful grant, we organized an in-person workshop on quantitative research methods and R programming. The team identified research questions and completed data cleaning/harmonization of program data. HEKA was successful because we emphasized a co-leadership framework (research direction evolved through shared/delegated leadership), and peer-to-peer mentorship. Major challenges included: obtaining sustained funding for engagement; ensuring the learning pace allows all individuals to be on the same page; confronting the socio-political climate; long commutes between counties for in-person meetings; and the limitation in using Excel files as primary tools for data capture.
Conclusions HEKA demonstrates the potential for community-based and led research in the HIV/STI field. The model we present can serve as a blueprint for other community-based organizations aiming to lead collaborative or independent research and build capacity.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Amref grant number P1490/2023 New Frontiers in Research Exploration Grant number NFRFE-2023-00436
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We have ethics approval through AMREF Africa (ESRC P1490/2023) and the University of Toronto (RIS Human Protocol Number: 46631).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵¶ Co-senior authors
Data Availability
Not applicable
