Abstract
Integrating point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) into patient care requires a multi-faceted culture change using a multi-pronged approach. A standardized implementation method is lacking for POCUS program sustainability. We developed a standardized training curriculum and clinical POCUS documentation, archival, and image review process at a single Veterans Affairs Emergency Department (ED). We hypothesized that co-designed development and implementation of the multifaceted POCUS intervention would maximize ED provider uptake and sustainability.
Using Participatory Action Research (PAR) and adapted Experience-Based Co-design (EBCD) methods, stakeholders collaboratively co-designed our POCUS intervention to optimize implementation. Using the PRODUCES framework, twelve stakeholder participants (co-creators including study researchers, ultrasound faculty, ED leadership, and ED providers (POCUS end-users)) met in four monthly co-design meetings from July to October 2021 to brainstorm, discuss, refine, and finalize the POCUS intervention and implementation plan.
Throughout the co-design process, stakeholders reviewed findings from prior meetings, reflected on successes and failures, and held open discussions on refining and finalizing the proposed POCUS educational and clinical program. By involving stakeholders as co-creators throughout the co-design process, we maximized end-user POCUS enthusiasm, program uptake, and sustained use. This simple, streamlined, and generalizable user-centered co-design method serves as a framework for future POCUS implementation and dissemination plans.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by an SAEMF-AEUS grant #AG 2020-0000000099.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Source data were openly available before initiation of the study, which was approved by the VA IRB. No online databases exist, and information is available from the authors by request.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding and Conflicts of Interest: This study was funded by SAEMF-AEUS grant #AG 2020- 0000000099. The funders had no role in the design or execution of the study. There are no other conflicts of interest to report.
Role of participants: RGT (study PI; project lead/design/oversight, coordinating amongst collaborators and research personnel, establishing US documentation/storage/archiving process, weekly US QA process, monthly US training sessions, data collection, data analysis, writing and presentation of the findings). CAS (study design, co-design methodology, grant writing, manuscript revisions). LCR (VA ED Chief; project mentor, study design, monthly meetings, collaboration with VA staff and ED leadership support of POCUS endeavors, grant/manuscript review). AT (implementation science mentor, instructed and trained PI and team on coding, qualitative data analysis, and manuscript review). ESP (Duke EM Ultrasound Director; project mentor, study design, feedback on US processes and troubleshooting, grant/manuscript revisions). SAE (Duke EM Assistant Research Director; project mentor, assisted with study personnel enrollment, supervised coding training and qualitative data analysis, manuscript writing and revisions).
Research was presented at the Mediterranean Emergency Medicine Conference meeting in Rhodes, Greece, September 2023
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
