Abstract
Background Community-based organizations (CBOs) are critical in providing trusted and targeted HIV/STI services to gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM). Despite significant strides in CBOs’ involvement in HIV/STI research, there remain gaps in meaningful engagement, especially in quantitative research. This paper explores the development of HEKA, a community-led research platform where community-based organizations build capacity and leverage routinely collected program data to design research that aims to improve HIV/STI programs. We share a collective reflection on the lessons learned in the process, the challenges that emerged, and recommendations for facilitating community-based program science.
Methodology Through a collaborative process, seven CBOs serving GBMSM in Kenya created the HEKA Research Initiative and designed a framework of collaboration, through which we assessed the technical gaps in quantitative research among staff, applied for funding, co-designed capacity-building workshops with academic partners, and developed a research agenda. We established a monthly meeting frequency and through collective reflection, documented the lessons and challenges in the process.
Outcomes With our successful grant, we organized an in-person workshop on quantitative research methods and R programming. The team identified research questions and completed data cleaning/harmonization of program data. HEKA was successful because we emphasized a co-leadership framework (research direction evolved through shared/delegated leadership), and peer-to-peer mentorship. Major challenges included: obtaining sustained funding for engagement; ensuring the learning pace allows all individuals to be on the same page; confronting the socio-political climate; long commutes between counties for in-person meetings; and the limitation in using Excel files as primary tools for data capture.
Conclusions HEKA demonstrates the potential for community-based and led research in the HIV/STI field. The model we present can serve as a blueprint for other community-based organizations aiming to lead collaborative or independent research and build capacity.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Amref grant number P1490/2023 New Frontiers in Research Exploration Grant number NFRFE-2023-00436
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We have ethics approval through AMREF Africa (ESRC P1490/2023) and the University of Toronto (RIS Human Protocol Number: 46631).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵¶ Co-senior authors
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos