Follow this preprint
Towards an extended classification of noise-distortion preferences by modeling longitudinal dynamics of listening choices
View ORCID ProfileGiulia Angonese, Mareike Buhl, Jonathan A. Gößwein, Birger Kollmeier, Andrea Hildebrandt
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.25.24316092
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Giulia Angonese
1Cluster of Excellence ‘Hearing4all’, Oldenburg, Germany;
2Department of Psychology, Psychological Methods and Statistics, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Germany;
Mareike Buhl
1Cluster of Excellence ‘Hearing4all’, Oldenburg, Germany;
5IHU reConnect, Institut de l’Audition, Fondation Pour l’Audition, Inserm, AP-HP, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, F-75012 Paris, France
Jonathan A. Gößwein
1Cluster of Excellence ‘Hearing4all’, Oldenburg, Germany;
6Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Media Technology (IDMT), Branch for Hearing, Speech and Audio Technology (HSA), Oldenburg, Germany
Birger Kollmeier
1Cluster of Excellence ‘Hearing4all’, Oldenburg, Germany;
3Department of Medical Physics and Acoustics, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Germany;
4Research Center Neurosensory Science, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Germany
Andrea Hildebrandt
1Cluster of Excellence ‘Hearing4all’, Oldenburg, Germany;
2Department of Psychology, Psychological Methods and Statistics, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Germany;
4Research Center Neurosensory Science, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Germany

Posted October 27, 2024.
Towards an extended classification of noise-distortion preferences by modeling longitudinal dynamics of listening choices
Giulia Angonese, Mareike Buhl, Jonathan A. Gößwein, Birger Kollmeier, Andrea Hildebrandt
medRxiv 2024.10.25.24316092; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.25.24316092
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
0
Author Videos
Subject Areas
- Addiction Medicine (418)
- Allergy and Immunology (740)
- Anesthesia (217)
- Cardiovascular Medicine (3171)
- Dermatology (268)
- Emergency Medicine (469)
- Epidemiology (13143)
- Forensic Medicine (17)
- Gastroenterology (878)
- Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4971)
- Geriatric Medicine (458)
- Health Economics (761)
- Health Informatics (3130)
- Health Policy (1114)
- Hematology (418)
- HIV/AIDS (987)
- Medical Education (462)
- Medical Ethics (121)
- Nephrology (511)
- Neurology (4720)
- Nursing (250)
- Nutrition (699)
- Oncology (2432)
- Ophthalmology (691)
- Orthopedics (272)
- Otolaryngology (335)
- Pain Medicine (315)
- Palliative Medicine (88)
- Pathology (523)
- Pediatrics (1263)
- Primary Care Research (536)
- Public and Global Health (7290)
- Radiology and Imaging (1631)
- Respiratory Medicine (953)
- Rheumatology (468)
- Sports Medicine (409)
- Surgery (527)
- Toxicology (66)
- Transplantation (225)
- Urology (196)