PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Angonese, Giulia AU - Buhl, Mareike AU - Gößwein, Jonathan A. AU - Kollmeier, Birger AU - Hildebrandt, Andrea TI - Towards an extended classification of noise-distortion preferences by modeling longitudinal dynamics of listening choices AID - 10.1101/2024.10.25.24316092 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.10.25.24316092 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/10/27/2024.10.25.24316092.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/10/27/2024.10.25.24316092.full AB - Individuals have different preferences for setting hearing aid (HA) algorithms that reduce ambient noise but introduce signal distortions. “Noise haters” prefer greater noise reduction, even at the expense of signal quality. “Distortion haters” accept higher noise levels to avoid signal distortion. These preferences were assumed to be stable over time, and individuals were classified solely on the basis of these stable, trait scores. However, the question remains as to how stable individual listening preferences are and whether day-to-day state-related variability needs to be considered as a further criterion for classification. We designed a mobile task to measure noise-distortion preferences over two weeks in an ecological momentary assessment study with N = 185 (106 f, Mage = 63.1, SDage = 6.5) unaided individuals with subjective hearing difficulties. Latent State-Trait Autoregressive (LST-AR) modeling was used to evaluate stability and dynamics of individual listening preferences. The analysis revealed a significant amount of state-related variance. The model has been extended to a mixture LST-AR model for data-driven classification, taking into account trait and state components of listening preferences. In addition to successful identification of noise haters, distortion haters and a third intermediate class based on longitudinal, outside of the lab data, we further differentiated individuals with different degrees of variability in listening preferences. It follows that individualisation of HA fitting could be improved by assessing individual preferences along the noise-distortion trade-off, and the day-to-day variability of these preferences needs to be taken into account for some individuals more than others.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research has been funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy EXC 2177/1 Project ID 390895286.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Research Ethics Committee of the Carl von Ossietzky Universitaet of Oldenburg gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data is available upon motivated request to the corresponding authors. Analyses scripts are available in the Zenodo repository. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13960717 AcronymsAICAkaike Information CriterionANLAcceptable Noise LevelARAutoregressiveBICBayesian Information CriterionCFAConfirmatory Factor AnalysisCFIComparative Fit IndexEMAEcological Momentary AssessmenHAHearing AidLSTLatent State-TraitLST-ARLatent State-Trait AutoregressiveMLRMaximum Likelihood RobustNRNoise ReductionPSMPerceptual Similarity MeasurePTAPure Tone AverageRMSEARoot-Mean-Square Error of ApproximationSABICSample-Size Adjusted Bayesian Information CriterionSNRSignal-to-Noise RatioSRMRStandardised Root Mean square ResidualSRTSpeech Recognition ThresholdTLITucker-Lewis Index