Abstract
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have created new ways to support radiological diagnostics. While both open-source and proprietary LLMs can address privacy concerns through local or cloud deployment, open-source models provide advantages in continuity of access, and potentially lower costs. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of eleven state-of-the-art open-source LLMs using clinical and imaging descriptions from 1,933 case reports in the Eurorad library. LLMs provided differential diagnoses based on clinical history and imaging findings. Responses were considered correct if the true diagnosis was included in the top three LLM suggestions. Llama-3-70B evaluated LLM responses, with its accuracy validated against radiologist ratings in a case subset. Models were further tested on 60 non-public brain MRI cases from a tertiary hospital to assess generalizability. Llama-3-70B demonstrated superior performance, followed by Gemma-2-27B and Mixtral-8x-7B. Similar performance results were found in the non-public dataset, where Llama-3-70B, Gemma-2-27B, and Mixtral-8x-7B again emerged as the top models. Our findings highlight the potential of open-source LLMs as decision support tools for radiological differential diagnosis in challenging, real-world cases.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of the Technical University of Munich gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Case sample was adjusted and outcome metrics modified accordingly
Data Availability
The Python code used in the present study is publicly available online at our GitHub repository (https://github.com/ai-idt/os_llm_eurorad).
