RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Performance of Open-Source LLMs in Challenging Radiological Cases – A Benchmark Study on 1,933 Eurorad Case Reports
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.09.04.24313026
DO 10.1101/2024.09.04.24313026
A1 Kim, Su Hwan
A1 Schramm, Severin
A1 Adams, Lisa C.
A1 Braren, Rickmer
A1 Bressem, Keno K.
A1 Keicher, Matthias
A1 Zimmer, Claus
A1 Hedderich, Dennis M.
A1 Wiestler, Benedikt
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/10/03/2024.09.04.24313026.abstract
AB Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have created new ways to support radiological diagnostics. While both open-source and proprietary LLMs can address privacy concerns through local or cloud deployment, open-source models provide advantages in continuity of access, and potentially lower costs. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of eleven state-of-the-art open-source LLMs using clinical and imaging descriptions from 1,933 case reports in the Eurorad library. LLMs provided differential diagnoses based on clinical history and imaging findings. Responses were considered correct if the true diagnosis was included in the top three LLM suggestions. Llama-3-70B evaluated LLM responses, with its accuracy validated against radiologist ratings in a case subset. Models were further tested on 60 non-public brain MRI cases from a tertiary hospital to assess generalizability. Llama-3-70B demonstrated superior performance, followed by Gemma-2-27B and Mixtral-8x-7B. Similar performance results were found in the non-public dataset, where Llama-3-70B, Gemma-2-27B, and Mixtral-8x-7B again emerged as the top models. Our findings highlight the potential of open-source LLMs as decision support tools for radiological differential diagnosis in challenging, real-world cases.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee/IRB of the Technical University of Munich gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe Python code used in the present study is publicly available online at our GitHub repository (https://github.com/ai-idt/os_llm_eurorad). https://eurorad.org/ https://github.com/ai-idt/os_llm_eurorad