ABSTRACT
Background Machine learning (ML) techniques improve disease prediction by identifying the most relevant features in multi-dimensional data. We compared the accuracy of ML algorithms for predicting incident diabetic kidney disease (DKD).
Methods We utilized longitudinal data from 1365 Chinese, Malay and Indian participants aged 40-80 years with diabetes but free of DKD who participated in the baseline and 6-year follow-up visit of the Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases Study (2004-2017). Incident DKD (11.9%) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73m2 with at least 25% decrease in eGFR at follow-up from baseline. 339 features including participant characteristics, retinal imaging, genetic and blood metabolites were used as predictors. Performances of several ML models were compared to each other and to logic regression (LR) model based on established features of DKD (age, sex, ethnicity, duration of diabetes, systolic blood pressure, HbA1c, and body mass index) using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
Results ML model, Elastic Net (EN) had the best AUC (95% confidence interval) of 0.851 (0.847-0.856), which was 7.0% relatively higher than by LR 0.795 (0.790-0.801). Sensitivity and specificity of EN were 88.2% and 65.9% vs. 73.0% and 72.8% by LR. The top-15 predictors included age, ethnicity, antidiabetic medication, hypertension, diabetic retinopathy, systolic blood pressure, HbA1c, eGFR and metabolites related to lipids, lipoproteins, fatty acids and ketone bodies.
Conclusions Our results showed ML together with feature selection improves prediction accuracy of DKD risk in an asymptomatic stable population and identifies novel risk factors including metabolites.
Funding Support This study was supported by the National Medical Research Council, NMRC/OFLCG/001/2017 and NMRC/HCSAINV/MOH-001019-00. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest None declared.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
N.A
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the National Medical Research Council, NMRC/OFLCG/001/2017 and NMRC/HCSAINV/MOH-001019-00. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was performed in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and ethics approval was obtained from the Singapore Eye Research Institute Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent was provided by participants.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
Data Availability Statement: As the study involves human participants, the data cannot be made freely available in the manuscript, the supplemental files, or a public repository due to ethical restrictions. Nevertheless, the data are available from the Singapore Eye Research Institutional Ethics Committee for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. Interested researchers can send data access requests to the Singapore Eye Research Institute using the following email address: seri@seri.com.sg. Processed version of the datasets are provided in Supplementary Tables S1-S5.
