ABSTRACT
Geographic distance is a critical barrier to healthcare access, particularly for rural communities with poor transportation infrastructure who rely on non-motorized transportation. There is broad consensus on the importance of community health workers (CHWs) to reduce the effects of geographic isolation on healthcare access. Due to a lack of fine-scale spatial data and individual patient records, little is known about the precise effects of CHWs on removing geographic barriers at this level of the healthcare system. Relying on a high-quality, crowd-sourced dataset that includes all paths and buildings in the area, we explored the impact of geographic distance from CHWs on the use of CHW services for children under 5 years in the rural district of Ifanadiana, southeastern Madagascar from 2018-2021. We then used this analysis to determine key features of an optimal geographic design of the CHW system, specifically optimizing a single CHW location or installing additional CHW sites. We found that consultation rates by CHWs decreased with increasing distance patients travel to the CHW by approximately 28.1% per km. The optimization exercise revealed that the majority of CHW sites (50/80) were already in an optimal location or shared an optimal location with a primary health clinic. Relocating the remaining CHW sites based on a geographic optimum was predicted to increase consultation rates by only 7.4%. On the other hand, adding a second CHW site was predicted to increase consultation rates by 31.5%, with a larger effect in more geographically dispersed catchments. Geographic distance remains a barrier at the level of the CHW, but optimizing CHW site location based on geography alone will not result in large gains in consultation rates. Rather, alternative strategies, such as the creation of additional CHW sites or proactive care, should be considered.
Competing Interest Statement
Some authors are current or former employees of institutions discussed in this article, including the non-governmental organization PIVOT and the Government of Madagascar. These affiliations are explicitly listed in the article.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by internal funding from PIVOT and a grant from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Project ANR-19-CE36-0001-01).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The IHOPE longitudinal study was reviewed and approved by the Madagascar National Ethics Committee and the Harvard Medical School IRB, and de-identified data were provided by the authors for the current study. This research was conducted by an international team consisting of researchers, health practitioners, and international development workers with differing relations with and identities relative to the region and community of study. We explore how these power dynamics influenced our research process in a reflexivity statement in the supplement following Morton et al. (38).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
All code and data needed to reproduce the analysis are available in a figshare repository (private link: https://figshare.com/s/dae9593d5b7ffac1d062, to be made public upon acceptance). In addition, geographic routing data are available to visualize and download on Pivot’s research dashboard (https://research.pivot-dashboard.org/).
