Abstract
Background Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is a complex clinical entity that commonly includes ankle-foot impairment.
Objective To investigate the effects of midfoot joint mobilizations and a one-week home exercise program (HEP) compared to a sham intervention and HEP on pain, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), ankle-foot joint mobility, and neuromotor function in young adults with CAI.
Methods Twenty participants with CAI were instructed in a stretching, strengthening, and balance HEP and were randomized a priori to receive midfoot joint mobilizations (forefoot supination, cuboid glide and plantar 1st tarsometatarsal) or a sham laying-of-hands. Changes in foot morphology, joint mobility, strength, dynamic balance, and PROs assessing pain, physical, and psychological function were assessed pre-to-post treatment and one-week following. Participants crossed-over to receive the alternate treatment and were assessed pre-to-post treatment and one-week following. Linear modelling was used to assess changes in outcomes.
Results Participants who received midfoot mobilization demonstrated significantly greater perceived improvement immediately posttreatment in the single assessment numeric evaluation (Sham: 5.0±10.2%; Mobilization: 43.9±26.2%; β: 6.8 p<0.001, Adj R2:0.17) and Global Rating of Change (Sham: −0.1±1.1; Mobilization: 1.1±3.0; β: 1.8 p=0.01, Adj R2:0.12). Following the mobilization intervention, participants demonstrated greater improved rearfoot inversion mobility (Sham: 4.4±8.4°; Mobilization: −1.6±6.1°; β: −6.37, p=0.01, Adj R2:0.19), plantarflexion mobility (Sham: 2.7°±6.4; Mobilization: −1.7°±4.3; β: −4.36, p=0.02, Adj R2:0.07), and posteromedial dynamic balance (Sham: 2.4±5.9%; Mobilization: 6.0±5.4%; β: 3.88, p=0.04, Adj R2:0.10) compared to controls at 1-week post-treatment.
Conclusion Participants with CAI who received midfoot joint mobilization had greater perceived improvement and physical signs that may benefit this clinical population.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
National Institutes of Health (NCT02697461)
Funding Statement
This study was funded in part by the University of Virginia's Curry School of Education Foundation and the Navy Medicine Professional Development Center.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All participants provided informed consent and this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Health Sciences Research at the University of Virginia in compliance with all applicable Federal regulations governing the protection of human subjects.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
abbisjaffri{at}creighton.edu;
John.j.fraser8.mil{at}mail.mil;, Twitter: @NavyPT
rmr214{at}txstate.edu;
jnh7g{at}virginia.edu;
Conflicts of Interest: We affirm that we have no financial affiliation or involvement with any commercial, organization that has a direct financial interest in any matter included in this manuscript.
Disclosures: This study was funded in part by the University of Virginia’s Curry School of Education Foundation and the Navy Medicine Professional Development Center. The views expressed in this manuscript reflect the results of research conducted by the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, nor the U.S. Government. Commander John J. Fraser is a military service member and this work was prepared as part of his official duties. Title 17, USC, §105 provides that ‘Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the U.S. Government.’ Title 17, USC, §101 defines a U.S. Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person’s official duties. All participants provided informed consent and this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Health Sciences Research at the University of Virginia in compliance with all applicable Federal regulations governing the protection of human subjects.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
