PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Jaffri, Abbis AU - Fraser, John J. AU - Koldenhoven, Rachel M. AU - Hertel, Jay TI - Effects of midfoot joint mobilization on perceived ankle-foot function in chronic ankle instability. A crossover clinical trial AID - 10.1101/2021.12.08.21267445 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.12.08.21267445 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/11/2021.12.08.21267445.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/11/2021.12.08.21267445.full AB - Background Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is a complex clinical entity that commonly includes ankle-foot impairment.Objective To investigate the effects of midfoot joint mobilizations and a one-week home exercise program (HEP) compared to a sham intervention and HEP on pain, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), ankle-foot joint mobility, and neuromotor function in young adults with CAI.Methods Twenty participants with CAI were instructed in a stretching, strengthening, and balance HEP and were randomized a priori to receive midfoot joint mobilizations (forefoot supination, cuboid glide and plantar 1st tarsometatarsal) or a sham laying-of-hands. Changes in foot morphology, joint mobility, strength, dynamic balance, and PROs assessing pain, physical, and psychological function were assessed pre-to-post treatment and one-week following. Participants crossed-over to receive the alternate treatment and were assessed pre-to-post treatment and one-week following. Linear modelling was used to assess changes in outcomes.Results Participants who received midfoot mobilization demonstrated significantly greater perceived improvement immediately posttreatment in the single assessment numeric evaluation (Sham: 5.0±10.2%; Mobilization: 43.9±26.2%; β: 6.8 p<0.001, Adj R2:0.17) and Global Rating of Change (Sham: −0.1±1.1; Mobilization: 1.1±3.0; β: 1.8 p=0.01, Adj R2:0.12). Following the mobilization intervention, participants demonstrated greater improved rearfoot inversion mobility (Sham: 4.4±8.4°; Mobilization: −1.6±6.1°; β: −6.37, p=0.01, Adj R2:0.19), plantarflexion mobility (Sham: 2.7°±6.4; Mobilization: −1.7°±4.3; β: −4.36, p=0.02, Adj R2:0.07), and posteromedial dynamic balance (Sham: 2.4±5.9%; Mobilization: 6.0±5.4%; β: 3.88, p=0.04, Adj R2:0.10) compared to controls at 1-week post-treatment.Conclusion Participants with CAI who received midfoot joint mobilization had greater perceived improvement and physical signs that may benefit this clinical population.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNational Institutes of Health (NCT02697461)Funding StatementThis study was funded in part by the University of Virginia's Curry School of Education Foundation and the Navy Medicine Professional Development Center.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All participants provided informed consent and this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Health Sciences Research at the University of Virginia in compliance with all applicable Federal regulations governing the protection of human subjects.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.