ABSTRACT
Background The Covid-19 pandemic has placed unprecedented pressure on healthcare systems and workers around the world. Such pressures may impact on working conditions, psychological wellbeing and perception of safety. In spite of this, no study has assessed the relationship between safety attitudes and psychological outcomes. Moreover, only limited studies have examined the relationship between personal characteristics and psychological outcomes during Covid-19.
Methods From 22nd March 2020 to 18th June 2020, healthcare workers from the United Kingdom, Poland, and Singapore were invited to participate using a self-administered questionnaire comprising the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to evaluate safety culture, burnout and anxiety/depression. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine predictors of burnout, anxiety and depression.
Results Of 3,537 healthcare workers who participated in the study, 2,364 (67%) screened positive for burnout, 701 (20%) for anxiety, and 389 (11%) for depression. Significant predictors of burnout included patient-facing roles: doctor (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.49-2.95), nurse (OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.04-1.84), and ‘other clinical’ (OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.45-2.82); being redeployed (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.02-1.58), bottom quartile SAQ score (OR 2.43; 95% CI 1.98-2.99), anxiety (OR 4.87; 95% CI 3.92-6.06) and depression (OR 4.06; 95% CI 3.04-5.42). Factors significantly protective for burnout included being tested for SARS-CoV-2 (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.51-0.82) and top quartile SAQ score (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.22-0.40). Significant factors associated with anxiety and depression, included burnout, gender, safety attitudes and job role.
Conclusion Our findings demonstrate a significant burden of burnout, anxiety, and depression amongst healthcare workers. A strong association was seen between SARS-CoV-2 testing, safety attitudes, gender, job role, redeployment and psychological state. These findings highlight the importance of targeted support services for at risk groups and proactive SARS-CoV-2 testing of healthcare workers.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
Not a prospective clinical trial
Clinical Protocols
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Odpo1iASbNKS8od4NrmEkh6q2QjpFHfX/view
Funding Statement
JK has received an educational grant from Johnson and Johnson. No funding was received directly relating to this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institutional ethical approval was obtained for data collection in the United Kingdom and Poland by the Imperial College Research Ethics Committee (ICREC) Ref:20IC5890, and Singapore by the National Healthcare Group Domain Specific Research Board (NHS DSRB) Ref 2020-00598.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
EthicsEthical approval was granted by the Imperial College Research Ethics Committee in respect to the United Kingdom and Poland (ICREC reference: 20IC5890) and the Singapore National Healthcare Group Domain Specific Research Board (NHG DSRB Reference 2020-00598) in Singapore.
Contibutorship statement All authors conceived the idea. MD, VS, SC, AK obtained ethical approval. Regional leads were responsible for local data collection UK (MD, ETG), Singapore (BT, AK), Poland (JP, GZ). All authors assisted with data collection. MD, ETG, MA, AS conducted data analysis. MD, ETG, BT, AK wrote the first draft, all authors reviewed subsequent drafts and approved the final submission. JK is guarantor for the UK arm and overall study. GD is guarantor for the Polish arm of the study. SO is guarantor for the Singapore arm of the study
Funding JK has received an educational grant from Johnson and Johnson. No funding was received directly relating to this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Data Availability
Data analysed in this study are available on request from the authors, if appropriate.
