RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Determinants of Burnout and Other Aspects of Psychological Well-Being in Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multinational Cross-Sectional Study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.07.16.20155622
DO 10.1101/2020.07.16.20155622
A1 Scott, Alasdair
A1 Tan, Benjamin YQ
A1 Huak, Chan Yiong
A1 Sia, Ching-Hui
A1 Xian, Chua Ying
A1 Goh, Ee Teng
A1 Zbikowska, Gabriela
A1 Dykowska, Grazyna
A1 Martin, Guy
A1 Kinross, James
A1 Przybylowicz, Jan
A1 Fedorowski, Jaroslaw
A1 Beatty, Jasmine Winter
A1 Clarke, Jonathan
A1 Sim, Kang
A1 Abhiram, Kanneganti
A1 Flott, Kelsey
A1 Lim, Lucas JH
A1 Wells, Mary
A1 Denning, Max
A1 Almonte, Melanie T
A1 Tan, Melanie
A1 Mason, Sam
A1 Purkayastha, Sanjay
A1 Yalamanchili, Seema
A1 Markar, Sheraz
A1 Ooi, Shirley BS
A1 Chidambaran, Swathikan
A1 Lifeng, Tan
A1 Sharma, Vijay K
A1 Sounderajah, Viknesh
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/18/2020.07.16.20155622.abstract
AB Background The Covid-19 pandemic has placed unprecedented pressure on healthcare systems and workers around the world. Such pressures may impact on working conditions, psychological wellbeing and perception of safety. In spite of this, no study has assessed the relationship between safety attitudes and psychological outcomes. Moreover, only limited studies have examined the relationship between personal characteristics and psychological outcomes during Covid-19.Methods From 22nd March 2020 to 18th June 2020, healthcare workers from the United Kingdom, Poland, and Singapore were invited to participate using a self-administered questionnaire comprising the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to evaluate safety culture, burnout and anxiety/depression. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine predictors of burnout, anxiety and depression.Results Of 3,537 healthcare workers who participated in the study, 2,364 (67%) screened positive for burnout, 701 (20%) for anxiety, and 389 (11%) for depression. Significant predictors of burnout included patient-facing roles: doctor (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.49-2.95), nurse (OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.04-1.84), and ‘other clinical’ (OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.45-2.82); being redeployed (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.02-1.58), bottom quartile SAQ score (OR 2.43; 95% CI 1.98-2.99), anxiety (OR 4.87; 95% CI 3.92-6.06) and depression (OR 4.06; 95% CI 3.04-5.42). Factors significantly protective for burnout included being tested for SARS-CoV-2 (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.51-0.82) and top quartile SAQ score (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.22-0.40). Significant factors associated with anxiety and depression, included burnout, gender, safety attitudes and job role.Conclusion Our findings demonstrate a significant burden of burnout, anxiety, and depression amongst healthcare workers. A strong association was seen between SARS-CoV-2 testing, safety attitudes, gender, job role, redeployment and psychological state. These findings highlight the importance of targeted support services for at risk groups and proactive SARS-CoV-2 testing of healthcare workers.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNot a prospective clinical trialClinical Protocols https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Odpo1iASbNKS8od4NrmEkh6q2QjpFHfX/view Funding StatementJK has received an educational grant from Johnson and Johnson. No funding was received directly relating to this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional ethical approval was obtained for data collection in the United Kingdom and Poland by the Imperial College Research Ethics Committee (ICREC) Ref:20IC5890, and Singapore by the National Healthcare Group Domain Specific Research Board (NHS DSRB) Ref 2020-00598.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData analysed in this study are available on request from the authors, if appropriate.