Abstract
Background There is conflicting evidence of the role of antibiotic in driving antimicrobial resistance. Existing studies asses use-resistance relationships typically only for few pathogens, for narrow time window, or only in one geographic space, and/or for few pathogen-antibiotic combinations and often only one pathogen and antibiotic (class) at a time. No systematic evidence of whether some antibiotics are more efficient at selecting for resistance than others. Here, we tested the hypothesis that each antibiotic class exerts selection for the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns resistant to it, using data on four major pathogens in the US Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. Methods We analysed clinical microbiology data from electronic health records from patients admitted to 138 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers with acute care wards across the USA from Feb 1, 2007, to Dec 31, 2021. We used clinical isolates classified as hospital-onset Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We quantified inpatient antibiotic prescribing as days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days and the antibiogram incidence as the number of incident isolates with that antibiogram per 1,000 admissions. We performed time trend analyses for antibiogram incidence and antibiotic prescribing using generalized estimating equations and reported average annual percentage changes (AAPC). We performed hierarchical multinomial logistic regressions to estimate the effect of inpatient facility-level prescribing on antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. We included calendar time, facility characteristics, and community prevalence of a respective antibiogram as covariates to account for ecological confounding. Results From 2007 to 2021, the incidence of hospital-onset isolates declined for all four pathogens except E. coli isolates resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (3GC) and co-resistant to either fluoroquinolones or beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLI), or both. Over the same period, antibiotic prescribing generally remained stable or decreased, with the notable exception of 3GC prescribing, which increased from 2007 to 2019 (AAPC: 2.4%, 95% CI: 1.3%-3.5%). In general, higher facility-level use of a given antibiotic was associated with increased resistance to that antibiotic, although exceptions were observed. Fluoroquinolones consistently selected for resistance across the four pathogens. In S aureus, each additional 14-day course of fluoroquinolones (per 1,000 patient-days) was linked to a 5.9% (95% CI: 0.8%-11.2%) increase in the odds of isolating a fluoroquinolone-resistant, macrolide-susceptible, methicillin-resistant phenotype. Anti-staphylococcal beta-lactams were not associated with methicillin-resistant S aureus. In Enterobacterales, each additional 14-day course of 3GC treatment increased the odds of isolating 3GC- and BL/BLI-resistant E coli by 7.4% (95% CI: 1.8%-13.4%) and K pneumoniae by 4.1% (95% CI: 0.0%-8.7%). For P aeruginosa, antipseudomonal carbapenem use selected for carbapenem-resistant isolates; the largest effect was observed in carbapenem-resistant phenotypes susceptible to fluoroquinolones and 3GC, where each additional 14-day course increased the odds by 22.6% (95% CI: 13.4%-32.7%). Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that fluoroquinolones play a key role in selecting for resistance across multiple pathogens, underscoring their significance as a driver of AMR. Although these results highlight the importance of cautious fluoroquinolone use and targeted stewardship strategies, we also observed that reductions in fluoroquinolone prescribing were offset by increased 3GC prescribing and co-resistance in E coli. Consequently, effective AMR mitigation requires comprehensive stewardship approaches that address multiple antibiotic classes in tandem rather than in isolation.
Competing Interest Statement
Yonatan Grad serves on the Scientific Advisory Boards of Day Zero Diagnostics and of Decoy Therapeutics and received US National Institutes of Health grants (R01AI32606, R01AI53521, and R21AI72369, all not related to this project). Karim Khader received support from Veterans Affairs Health Systems Research (IIR 21-273) and for two studies from BioMerieux Clinical (IRB_00170297, IRB_00140336). All other authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ("Modeling and Simulation to Support Epidemiological Decision-Making in Healthcare Settings" (Modeling Infectious Diseases in Healthcare (MInD-Healthcare) Program) award U01CK000585. MS was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (grant number: R01HS025175) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (grant number: 1I50HX002731-01). We thank the Department of Veterans Affairs for the supported infrastructure and data resources. Funding resources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Authors were not precluded from accessing data in the study, and they accept responsibility to submit for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of University of Utah gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.