Abstract
This study examines the use of Beatrice Alemagna’s picture book "What is a Child?" as a tool for understanding and implementing nurturing care principles in perinatal healthcare settings. Through mixed-methods analysis of forum discussions among 42 perinatal professionals, including psychologists, midwives, physicians, nurses, pharmacists and early childhood educators, we explored how engagement with the book’s metaphorical and visual elements facilitated professional reflection and development. Qualitative analysis revealed four primary themes: the power of metaphors in conveying complex caregiving concepts, the importance of collective care and community support, understanding the temporality of care, and fostering transformative dialogue. Quantitative analysis demonstrated significant differences in thematic engagement across professional groups, with medical professionals emphasizing physical health (20.8%) and nutrition (32.1%), while psychologists focused more on early learning opportunities (28.3%) and responsive caregiving (21.0%). However, the picture book’s narrative framework encouraged professionals to transcend their domain-specific perspectives, fostering a more holistic appreciation of nurturing care principles. These findings suggest that carefully selected picture books can serve as sophisticated tools for professional development in perinatal care, particularly in translating abstract theoretical concepts into actionable insights while honoring different professional perspectives and expertise.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study analyzed anonymized contributions from a professional forum. While no personal data were collected, participants consented to the use of their forum posts for research purposes, as explicitly mentioned in the forum's participation guidelines. Additionally, all participants are acknowledged in the manuscript for their valuable contributions. The Ethics Committee for Research of the University of Florence does not require formal approval for studies of this nature, as they do not involve the collection of sensitive personal data or direct interaction with participants beyond the scope of their original forum activity.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
