Abstract
Fish oil supplements (FOS) are known to alter circulating levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) among individuals but in a heterogeneous manner. These varied responses may result from unidentified gene-FOS interactions. To identify genetic factors that interact with FOS to alter the circulating levels of PUFAs, we performed a multi-level genome-wide interaction study (GWIS) of FOS on 14 plasma measurements in 200,060 unrelated European-ancestry individuals from the UK Biobank. From our single-variant tests, we identified genome-wide significant interacting SNPs (P < 5 × 10−8) in the FADS1-FADS2 gene cluster for total omega-3, omega-3%, docosapentaenoic acid (DHA), DHA% and the omega-6 to omega-3 ratio. Among the interaction signals for omega-3%, the lead SNP, rs35473591 (C>CT, CT allele frequency = 0.34), had a lower association effect size in the FOS-taking group (β = 0.35 for allele C) than that in the group without FOS (β = 0.42). Likewise, the effect sizes of associations between FOS and omega-3% varied across the three genotype groups (β = 0.45, 0.50, and 0.59, respectively, in C/C, C/CT, and CT/CT). Our gene-level aggregate and transcriptome-wide interaction analyses identified significant signals at two loci, around FADS1-FADS2 and GRP12. The contribution of genome-wide gene-FOS interactions to phenotypic variance was statistically significant in omega-3-related traits. This systemic gene-FOS GWIS contributes to our understanding of the genetic architecture of circulating PUFAs underlying FOS response and informs personalized dietary recommendations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institute of Health under the award number R35GM143060 (KY). The content is solely the authors' responsibility and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The UK Biobank received ethical approval from the National Research Ethics Service Committee North West-Haydock (reference ID 11/NW/0382).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The original manuscript did not show up properly, and there is no download option for the full text. So, I submit the main document again.
Data Availability
Data processed in this study was made available through the UK Biobank and accessed via an approved application. Data are not publicly available and can be accessed by applying through https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/register. Summary statistics will be available in the GWAS Catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/) after publication. Scripts used to process the data, perform analysis, and interpret results are available on GitHub (https://github.com/adannasusan/PUFA-GxE).