Abstract
Functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) is a well-established technique for studying brain networks in both healthy and diseased individuals. However, no fcMRI-based biomarker has yet achieved clinical relevance. To establish better understanding of the state of the art in quantifying abnormal connectivity in comparison to a reference distribution, for potential use in individual patients, we have conducted a scoping review over 5672 entries from the last 10 years. We have located five publications proposing methods of abnormal connectivity quantification, reported these methods and formalized them. We also illustrated the emerging trends and technical innovations in fcMRI research that may facilitate development of individualized fcMRI-based abnormal connectivity metrics.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
S.S. received support through the LMU Investment Fund (LMU Excellence AOST: 865105-7). Funding sources had no role in the design, implementation, analysis, interpretation, or reporting of this research.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
