Abstract
Background The World Health Organization calls for the development of new diagnostics to support large-scale deworming programs against strongyloidiasis. To better steer research and development (R&D) of new diagnostics, it is imperative to identify the minimal requirements that new diagnostics should meet, the so-called target product profiles (TPPs). While diagnostic TPPs exist for other major soil-transmitted helminthiases, none exist for strongyloidiasis.
Methods We investigated a range of potential diagnostic TPPs using our previously developed simulation framework for the effect of imperfect diagnostics on the cost and correctness of program decisions. With this framework, we studied the minimum requirements for diagnostic performance, cost per test and sample throughput for future assays while comparing the survey costs with those of the reference Baermann method. As potential assay platforms, we considered antibody (Ab)-detecting assays, including a point-of-care lateral flow assay (LFA) and a laboratory-based Ab-ELISA. We also determined cost-efficient school-based survey designs for two currently available assays: Bordier Ab-ELISA and a prototype NIE-LFA.
Principal findings Our findings highlighted that (i) specificity rather than sensitivity is a critical parameter to consider for R&D of new diagnostic methods for monitoring control programs; (ii) the requirements for diagnostic performance became less stringent with an increasing sample size and when higher risks of incorrect decision-making were accepted. When focusing on the assay formats, the LFA resulted in lower survey costs compared to the Baermann method. Ab-ELISA was cost-efficient only if the diagnostic performance was nearly perfect combined with low cost per test and high sample throughput. Of all the three assays considered here, the prototype NIE-LFA allowed for the most cost-efficient survey designs.
Conclusion/significance R&D should focus on developing point-of-care assays with high specificity. The prototype NIE-LFA is a cost-efficient alternative to Baermann to support control programs for strongyloidiasis.
Author summary The World Health Organization calls for the development of rapid, easy-to-use, and performant point-of-care diagnostics to follow up large-scale deworming programs against strongyloidiasis. However, there are no further recommendations regarding the required performance and cost of such new diagnostics. We performed a simulation study and a cost analysis to assess the minimum requirements in terms of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, cost per test, and sample throughput for future assays while comparing the survey costs with those of a reference method. In addition, we determined the most cost-efficient survey designs to support control programs for strongyloidiasis applying currently available assays. Our results indicate that research & development efforts should focus on developing point-of-care assays with high specificity. Of the currently available diagnostics, a prototype of a rapid diagnostic test resulted in the lowest total survey cost, while restricting the risk of incorrect policy decisions to the minimum.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethiopian Public Health Institute Scientific and Ethical Review Office (reference number SERO-128-4-2005) and the Institutional Review Board of Imperial College London (reference number ICREC_8_2_2) [1]. The school head provided written consent on behalf of students' families or guardians. Students provided verbal consent to be included in the survey.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its supporting information files
