Abstract
Integrating clinical knowledge into AI remains challenging despite numerous medical guidelines and vocabularies. Medical codes, central to healthcare systems, often reflect operational patterns shaped by geographic factors, national policies, insurance frameworks, and physician practices rather than the precise representation of clinical knowledge. This disconnect hampers AI in representing clinical relationships, raising concerns about bias, transparency, and generalizability. Here, we developed a resource of 67,124 clinical vocabulary embeddings derived from a clinical knowledge graph tailored to electronic health record vocabularies, spanning over 1.3 million edges. Using graph transformer neural networks, we generated clinical vocabulary embeddings that provide a new representation of clinical knowledge by unifying seven medical vocabularies. These embeddings were validated through a phenotype risk score analysis involving 4.57 million patients from Clalit Healthcare Services, effectively stratifying individuals based on survival outcomes. Inter-institutional panels of clinicians evaluated the embeddings for alignment with clinical knowledge across 90 diseases and 3,000 clinical codes, confirming their robustness and transferability. This resource addresses gaps in integrating clinical vocabularies into AI models and training datasets, paving the way for knowledge-grounded population and patient-level models.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
R.J., B.Y.R., R.D.B., N.D., and M.Z. are supported by the Berkowitz Family Living Laboratory at Harvard Medical School and the Clalit Research Institute. R.J. and M.Z. gratefully acknowledge the support of NIH R01-HD108794, NSF CAREER 2339524, US DoD FA8702-15-D-0001, awards from Harvard Data Science Initiative, Amazon Faculty Research, Google Research Scholar Program, AstraZeneca Research, Roche Alliance with Distinguished Scientists, Sanofi iDEA-iTECH, Pfizer Research, Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, John and Virginia Kaneb Fellowship at Har-vard Medical School, Biswas Computational Biology Initiative in partnership with the Milken In-stitute, Harvard Medical School Dean's Innovation Fund for the Use of Artificial Intelligence, and Kempner Institute for the Study of Natural and Artificial Intelligence at Harvard University.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Parts of this study that relate to the use of Clalit Healthcare Services (CHS) data (for evaluating the predictive ability of the KG-derived concept embeddings) were approved by the CHS Institutional Review Board (Helsinki) committee.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Revised abstract and main text.
Data availability
Data and clinical concept embeddings, as well as the PheKG knowledge graph, are available via Harvard Dataverse at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persisten-tId=doi:10.7910/DVN/Z6H1A8. Due to national and organizational data privacy regulations, CHS individual-level data from this study cannot be shared publicly.
