Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite advancements in neurosurgery and intensive care that reduce overall mortality, poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) (World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies [WFNS] grades IV and V) remains a significant clinical challenge and is associated with persistently high mortality rates. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes of poor-grade aSAH and to identify factors influencing patient prognosis to guide clinical management.
METHODS A multicentre, observational cohort study was conducted across 12 regional centres in northern China. The study included patients with poor-grade aSAH admitted from 2017 to 2020. The baseline data included demographics, clinical presentation, aneurysm characteristics, and treatment modalities. Outcome data, including survival status, mortality along with its associated causes and timing, and modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores, were collected prospectively at the last medical follow-up. Changes in case fatality over time were quantified with weighted linear regression. Survival analysis was performed to estimate survival and hazard ratios for death. Binary logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratio for dependency (mRS=3-5).
RESULTS Among the 1,589 enrolled patients, 1,339 were successfully followed, with an average follow-up of 26.37 months. Among them, 61.5% (824/1,339) were dependent or died. The overall mortality rate was 51% (684/1,339), and 21.3% (140/655) of the survivors were dependent. The risk factors for mortality included age ≥65 years, previous history of stroke, and WFNS grade V. Additionally, conservative treatment and endovascular treatment were identified as risk factors and protective factors, respectively, compared with surgical treatment. WFNS grade V and middle cerebral artery aneurysms are independent risk factors for dependency.
CONCLUSIONS Although there has been a downward trend in recent years, the long-term mortality rate for poor-grade aSAH has remained significantly high at 51%, with 21.3% of survivors being dependent. Active aneurysm treatment, to the extent possible, is crucial for improving the prognosis of these patients.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin, China (Grant No. 20JCZDJC00300), Tianjin Medical University Clinical Research Program (Grant No. 2018kylc008), the Tianjin Medical University General Hospital Clinical Research Program (Grant No. 22ZYYLCCG07), and The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University Science and Technology Emerging Talents Enhancement Program (Grant No. 2024PY07). The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study (chictr.org.cn, ID: ChiCTR2200065083) was approved by the Ethics Committee (the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (IRB2021-YX-178-01)) and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The requirement for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee because of the observational design of this study.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.