Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating the efficacy and safety of medical interventions but ethical, practical, and financial limitations often necessitate decisions based on observational data. The increasing volume of such data has prompted regulatory bodies to rely more on real-world evidence, primarily obtained through trial emulations. This study explores how genetic data can improve the design of both emulated and traditional trials. We successfully emulated four major cardiometabolic RCTs within FinnGen (N=425 483) and showed how reduced differences in polygenic scores (PGS) between trial arms track improved study design and consequently reduced residual confounding. Complementing these results with simulations, we show that PGS cannot be directly used to adjust for residual or unmeasured confounding. Instead, we propose an approach that uses genetic instruments for confounding detection and apply this approach to identify likely confounders in Empareg trial emulation. Finally, our results suggest that trial emulations can inform the practical application of PGS in RCTs, potentially improving statistical power. Such prognostic enrichment strategies need to be assessed in a trial-relevant population, and we show that, for 2 out of 4 emulated trials, the association between PGS and trial outcomes in the general population was different from what observed in the population included in the trial.
In conclusion, our work shows that genetic information can improve the design of emulated trials. These results contribute to the establishment of a promising new era of genetically-informed clinical trials.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by funding from the Eric and Wendy Schmidt Center at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics Committee of the FinnGen study and the participating biobanks gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵+ These authors jointly supervised the project
