ABSTRACT
Background As healthcare moves from a one-size-fits-all approach towards precision care, individual risk prediction is an important step in disease prevention and early detection. Biobank-linked healthcare systems can generate knowledge about genomic risk and test the impact of implementing that knowledge in care. Risk-stratified prostate cancer screening is one clinical application that might benefit from such an approach.
Methods We developed a clinical translation pipeline for genomics-informed prostate cancer screening in a national healthcare system. We used data from 585,418 male participants of the Veterans Affairs (VA) Million Veteran Program (MVP), among whom 101,920 self-identify as Black/African-American, to develop and validate the Prostate CAncer integrated Risk Evaluation (P-CARE) model, a prostate cancer risk prediction model based on a polygenic score, family history, and genetic principal components. The model was externally validated in data from 18,457 PRACTICAL Consortium participants. A novel blended genome-exome (BGE) platform was used to develop a clinical laboratory assay for both the P-CARE model and rare variants in prostate cancer-associated genes, including additional validation in 74,331 samples from the All of Us Research Program.
Results In overall and ancestry-stratified analyses, the polygenic score of 601 variants was associated with any, metastatic, and fatal prostate cancer in MVP and PRACTICAL. Values of the P-CARE model at ≥80th percentile in the multiancestry cohort overall were associated with hazard ratios (HR) of 2.75 (95% CI 2.66-2.84), 2.78 (95% CI 2.54-2.99), and 2.59 (95% CI 2.22-2.97) for any, metastatic, and fatal prostate cancer in MVP, respectively, compared to the median. When high– and low-risk groups were defined as P-CARE HR>1.5 and HR<0.75 for metastatic prostate cancer, the 220,062 (37.6%) high-risk vs.146,826 (25.1%) low-risk participants in MVP had a 47.9% vs. 14.1%, 9.3% vs. 2.0%, and 3.6% vs. 0.8% cumulative cause-specific incidence of any, metastatic, and fatal prostate cancer by age 90, respectively. The clinical assay and reports are now being implemented in a clinical trial of precision prostate cancer screening in the VA healthcare system (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05926102).
Conclusions A model consisting of a polygenic score, family history, and genetic principal components describes a clinically important gradient of prostate cancer risk in a diverse patient population and demonstrates the potential of learning health systems to implement and evaluate precision health care approaches.
Competing Interest Statement
N.L. has received speaking honoraria from Illumina Inc and is an advisory board member for FYR Diagnostics and Everygene. N.L has received research collaborative funding (for work unrelated to this publication) from Illumina Inc and PacBio Inc. JAL, KML, and CTC report grants from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Astellas Pharma, Inc., AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Biodesix, Inc, Celgene Corporation, Cerner Enviza, GSK PLC, IQVIA Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novartis International AG, Parexel International Corporation through the University of Utah or Western Institute for Veteran Research outside the submitted work. ASK reports fundings (for work unrelated to this publication) from Janssen, Pfizer, Profound, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck. SLD reports grants from AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Biodesix, Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Parexel, Moderna, GlaxoSmithKline, Cerner Enviza, Janssen Research & Development, Celgene, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, IQVIA, Astellas Pharma, and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals. RAE reports speaking honoraria from GU-ASCO, Janssen, University of Chicago, and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, educational honorarium from Bayer and Ipsen, being a member of external expert committee to Astra Zeneca UK and Member of Active Surveillance Movember Committee and is a member of the SAB of Our Future Health; additionally undertakes private practice as a sole trader at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and 90 Sloane Street SW1X 9PQ and 280 Kings Road SW3 4NX, London, UK. LAM reports research funding from Astra Zeneca to Harvard University; she holds equity in Convergent Therapeutics. TMS reports honoraria from Varian Medical Systems, WebMD, GE Healthcare, and Janssen; he has an equity interest in CorTechs Labs, Inc. and serves on its Scientific Advisory Board; he receives research funding from GE Healthcare through the University of California San Diego. These companies might potentially benefit from the research results. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by the University of California San Diego in accordance with its conflict-of-interest policies. The other authors have no disclosures.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the Million Veteran Program MVP022 award #I01CX001727 (PI: RLH) and MVP084 award #I01CX002635 (PI: JLV). See Supplement for additional funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Veterans Affairs Central Institutional Review Board approved this study (IRBNet 1735869 and 1735136).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
It is not possible for the authors to directly share the individual-level data that were obtained from the Million Veteran Program (MVP) due to constraints stipulated in the informed consent. Anyone wishing to gain access to this data should inquire directly to MVP at MVPLOI@va.gov. The data generated from our analyses are included in the manuscript.