Abstract
Background: Studies examining the associations of intensity-specific leisure time physical activity duration with all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer mortality are scarce and no quantitative or dose-response meta-analysis has been published. Objective: We examined the associations of moderate, vigorous, and moderate to vigorous leisure time physical activity duration with all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality, using aggregate and individual participant data. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of both published and unpublished cohort studies that included data on intensity-specific leisure time physical activity. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated by comparing high versus low levels of physical activity. We also harmonized and pooled individual participant data from unpublished large cohorts to assess dose-response associations with the same three mortality outcomes, as retrieved from National Death Registries. Results: A total of 3.36 million participants across 25 cohorts and 17 countries, corresponding to 247,463 all-cause, 70,204 CVD, and 76,294 cancer deaths were included in our aggregate meta-analysis. Compared to low physical activity, the association of high moderate intensity leisure time physical activity with mortality ranged from an HR of 0.84 (95% CI= 0.79, 0.89) for all-cause mortality to 0.90 (0.86, 0.95) for cancer mortality; and vigorous intensity from 0.86 (0.79, 0.93) for all-cause mortality to 0.88 (0.83, 0.91) for cancer mortality. Our pooled individual participant data analysis included 967,184 participants with an average follow-up time of 12.2 (SD= 4.7) years and 60,206 all-cause, 11,525 CVD, and 23,740 cancer deaths. The dose-response analysis showed a general L-shaped association across each outcome. For all-cause mortality, compared to the reference group with no leisure time activity, the minimal and optimal doses of vigorous intensity were 60 mins/week (0.86 [0.84, 0.89]) and 200 mins/week (0.69 [0.67, 0.71]), respectively. For moderate intensity, the corresponding doses were 100 mins/week (0.88 [0.86, 0.90]) and 340 mins/week (0.77 [0.75, 0.79]). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis shows distinct differential associations of moderate and vigorous physical activity with all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality risk. Improvements in leisure time physical activity approximately equivalent to 60 mins/week of vigorous or 100 mins/week of moderate activity, may be linked with measurable health benefits. Our findings, synthesized uniquely through aggregated and pooled individual participant meta-analyses offer novel evidence to guide decisions on contents of leisure time physical activity focused interventions and preventive guidelines.
Competing Interest Statement
Emmanuel Stamatakis is a paid consultant and holds equity in Complement 1, a US-based company whose products and services relate to physical activity. All other authors disclose no conflict of interest for this work.
Funding Statement
National Council for Scientific and Technological Development - CNPq (311109-2023-3; LFMR).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data generated as part of this systematic review are included as additional files in this published article.
