Abstract
Introduction Glioblastoma is a devastating brain tumor with poor prognosis despite current treatment modalities. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy has shown promise in other cancers but has yielded mixed results in glioblastoma. This augmented meta-analysis aims to address the limitations of previous studies and evaluate the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy for recurrent glioblastoma.
Methods We followed PRISMA guidelines, including specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, for our literature review. Eight studies with 108 patients were included. We used standard and augmented meta-analyses to assess outcomes, complications, and publication bias.
Results It was found that the mean overall survival for glioblastoma patients who underwent CAR T-cell therapy was 6.49 months, demonstrating no significant deviation from the median survival observed in those following the standard protocol. CAR T-cell therapy did not lead to a statistically significant improvement in achieving complete responses, with only 80% of patients exhibiting this outcome. Conversely, 44% of patients experienced stable disease, while 58% faced disease progression after CAR T-cell therapy. Adverse events were notable, with CAR T cell therapy-related encephalopathy affecting 37% of treated patients, while cytokine release syndrome was a rare event, observed in only 3% of cases.
Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study that utilizes this novel statistical technique to predict the outcomes of CAR T-cell therapy for recurrent glioblastoma. The results of this study are predictive rather than confirmatory. CAR T-cell therapy for glioblastoma was not predicted to significantly improve survival or achieve substantial complete responses. Stable disease rates are modest, while disease progression is notable. Adverse events, especially CAR T-cell therapy-related encephalopathy, raise safety concerns. Further trials and refinements are needed to enhance CAR T-cell therapy’s effectiveness and safety in glioblastoma treatment, Manuscript Click here to view linked References potentially through optimizing administration routes and target antigens or combining it with other therapies. This challenging disease necessitates continued research to improve patient outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
N/A
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
N/A
