Abstract
Electronic health records (EHRs) are digitalized medical charts and the standard method of clinical data collection. They have emerged as valuable sources of data for outcomes research, offering vast repositories of patient information for analysis. Definitions for pediatric sepsis diagnosis are ambiguous, resulting in delayed diagnosis and treatment, highlighting the need for precise and efficient patient categorizing techniques. Nevertheless, the use of EHRs in research poses challenges. EHRs, although originally created to document patient encounters, are now primarily used to satisfy billing requirements. As a result, EHR data may lack granularity, potentially leading to misclassification and incomplete representation of patient conditions. We compared data-driven ICD code categories to chart review using probabilistic graphical models (PGMs) due to their ability to handle uncertainty and incorporate prior knowledge. Overall, this paper demonstrates the potential of using PGMs to address these challenges and improve the analysis of ICD codes for sepsis outcomes research.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Lourdes Valdez is supported by the NLM Training grant T15LM007124 awarded to Karen Eilbeck. The study was also funded by the NIH R01 GM134331 grant and Department of Defense award W81XWH-22-1-0800 (SC210103) awarded to Matthew A. Mulvey
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Boards of the University of Utah and Primary Childrens Hospitals approved this study with a waiver of informed consent as the data has been analyzed anonymously (IRB#00097637).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
