Abstract
Background The health system is required to be safe, equitable, and accessible to all ages, gender, and vulnerable groups, including older persons and persons with disability, and address their specific needs and concerns. However, limited evidence is available on the effectiveness and practicality of gender and protection mainstreaming interventions in health response in humanitarian crises.
Objective The overall objective of the research was to explore practices, gaps, and challenges and generate recommendations regarding gender and protection mainstreaming in health response to the Rohingya refugee crisis in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh.
Methodology The research employed a qualitative case study design to explore the practice of gender and protection mainstreaming in health response in Cox’s Bazar. Data collection methods include an extensive literature review and in-depth interviews with professionals.
Result The study found a range of good practices on gender and protection mainstreaming in health response, e.g. placement of a gender action plan, monitoring system for gender and disability inclusion, emergency preparedness and response system, availability of sex-segregated toilets and waiting spaces, availability of gender-based violence service and engagement of female community health workers. The study also revealed some best practices which have the potential to scale up, e,g. psycho-social spaces at health facilities for children, palliative care for terminally ill patients, integrated medical and protection services, and facilitation of community health facility support groups. Critical gaps were found in the areas of women’s leadership, coordination, capacity building, targeted interventions for vulnerable groups, infrastructural adaptation and consultation with the community on their concerns.
Conclusion We urge policymakers, sector coordinators, health program management, healthcare workers, and global stakeholders to address the gaps and challenges, learn and scale up the best practices, and take action to implement the study’s recommendations to maximise gender and protection mainstreaming in health response.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The research project was reviewed and approved by the School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Ethics Committee at the University of Manchester (Ref: 2022-13668-24736). The study was designed in such a way that it eliminated any risk of physical or mental discomfort, harm, or damage from its process or publication and placed the highest priority on protecting the rights and welfare of research participants as well as vulnerable refugees in the target settings. The research is planned based on morality to address the evidence gaps on gender and protection mainstreaming in humanitarian health response and generate recommendations for improvement in this field in local and global humanitarian contexts. No commercial or financial relationships could be taken as a potential conflict of interest. The study did not collect any personally identifiable information (except for the consent form) or any sensitive or confidential information. The study did not involve participants from vulnerable or dependent groups, such as Rohingya refugees, considering their protection concerns. Before the interview with the professionals, the participants were provided with clear information on the background, objectives, and study procedure. Written informed consent was taken from each participant. Participants were allowed to skip any question or withdraw themselves from the interview at any time. All data were stored in the university-provided P-drive, and data analysis was done on an encrypted computer. In the case of online interviews, the recordings were permanently deleted from the storage once transcription writing was completed. Identifying information was stored securely and separately from the study data. The information was kept in a password-protected file.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
