Abstract
Background Intensive Care Units (ICUs) are recognized as highly demanding environments that significantly contribute to stress and burnout among nursing staff. Despite increasing concern over burnout in healthcare, the relationship between physiological stress indicators, such as heart rate variability (HRV), and psychometric assessments has not been thoroughly explored in this setting.
Objective This pilot study aimed to evaluate the relationship between HRV metrics and psychometric assessments of stress and anxiety in ICU nursing staff. Additionally, it explored the influence of shift type, shift duration, demographic factors, and lifestyle habits on these stress indicators.
Methods An observational cross-sectional pilot study was conducted with 24 ICU healthcare professionals at a University Hospital in Madrid, Spain. HRV data were collected under controlled conditions, with measurements taken at the beginning and end of shifts. Psychometric assessments were conducted using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14), Nursing Stress Scale (NSS), and a Visual Analogue Scale for Stress (VASS). Non-parametric statistical tests were used to analyze correlations between HRV metrics, psychometric scores, and demographic/lifestyle variables.
Results Significant negative correlations were observed between HRV metrics and perceived stress levels, particularly between the LF/HF ratio and stress measures. Night and extended shifts were associated with elevated stress, as indicated by lower HRV and higher psychometric stress scores. These findings suggest that shift type and duration significantly influence stress levels in ICU nursing staff.
Conclusion This pilot study highlights the potential of HRV as an objective measure of stress in ICU nursing staff, with significant correlations observed between HRV metrics and psychometric assessments. The findings suggest that HRV could be a valuable tool for monitoring stress in real-time and identifying individuals at risk of burnout. However, further research with larger samples and a longitudinal approach is needed to validate these results and explore their implications for occupational health practices in ICU settings.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study received ethical approval from the HM Hospitales Research Ethics Committee (Code: 18.12.1339.GHM)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available in publicly available repositories: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26869255
