ABSTRACT
MedSegBench is a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate deep learning models for medical image segmentation across a wide range of modalities.. This benchmark includes 35 datasets with over 60,000 images, covering modalities such as ultrasound, MRI, and X-ray. It addresses challenges in medical imaging, such as variability in image quality and dataset imbalances, by providing standardized datasets with train/validation/test splits. The benchmark supports binary and multi-class segmentation tasks with up to 19 classes. Evaluations are conducted using the U-Net architecture with various encoder/decoder networks, including ResNets, EfficientNet, and DenseNet, to evaluate model performance. MedSegBench serves as a valuable resource for developing robust and flexible segmentation algorithms. It allows for fair comparisons across different models and promotes the development of universal models for medical tasks. The datasets and source code are publicly available, encouraging further research and development in medical image analysis.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at Zenodo