Abstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare settings demands a nuanced approach that considers both technical performance and sociotechnical factors. Recognizing this, our study introduces the Clinical AI Sociotechnical Framework (CASoF), developed through literature synthesis, and refined via a Modified Delphi study involving global healthcare professionals. Our research identifies a critical gap in existing frameworks, which largely focus on either technical specifications or trial outcomes, neglecting the comprehensive sociotechnical dynamics essential for successful AI deployment in clinical environments. CASoF addresses this gap by providing a structured checklist that guides the planning, design, development, and implementation stages of AI systems in healthcare. The checklist emphasizes the importance of considering the value proposition, data integrity, human-AI interaction, technical architecture, organizational culture, and ongoing support and monitoring, ensuring that AI tools are not only technologically sound but also practically viable and socially adaptable within clinical settings. Our findings suggest that the successful integration of AI in healthcare depends on a balanced focus on both technological advancements and the socio-technical environment of clinical settings. CASoF represents a step forward in bridging this divide, offering a holistic approach to AI deployment that is mindful of the complexities of healthcare systems. The checklist aims to facilitate the development of AI tools that are effective, userfriendly, and seamlessly integrated into clinical workflows, ultimately enhancing patient care and healthcare outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of University of Illinois Chicago Health gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos