RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Checklist to Support the Development and Implementation of AI in Clinical Settings
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.08.08.24311701
DO 10.1101/2024.08.08.24311701
A1 Owoyemi, Ayomide
A1 Osuchukwu, Joanne
A1 Salwei, Megan
A1 Boyd, Andy
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/09/2024.08.08.24311701.abstract
AB The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare settings demands a nuanced approach that considers both technical performance and sociotechnical factors. Recognizing this, our study introduces the Clinical AI Sociotechnical Framework (CASoF), developed through literature synthesis, and refined via a Modified Delphi study involving global healthcare professionals. Our research identifies a critical gap in existing frameworks, which largely focus on either technical specifications or trial outcomes, neglecting the comprehensive sociotechnical dynamics essential for successful AI deployment in clinical environments. CASoF addresses this gap by providing a structured checklist that guides the planning, design, development, and implementation stages of AI systems in healthcare. The checklist emphasizes the importance of considering the value proposition, data integrity, human-AI interaction, technical architecture, organizational culture, and ongoing support and monitoring, ensuring that AI tools are not only technologically sound but also practically viable and socially adaptable within clinical settings. Our findings suggest that the successful integration of AI in healthcare depends on a balanced focus on both technological advancements and the socio-technical environment of clinical settings. CASoF represents a step forward in bridging this divide, offering a holistic approach to AI deployment that is mindful of the complexities of healthcare systems. The checklist aims to facilitate the development of AI tools that are effective, userfriendly, and seamlessly integrated into clinical workflows, ultimately enhancing patient care and healthcare outcomes.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee/IRB of University of Illinois Chicago Health gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors