Abstract
Introduction Father alcohol use negatively impacts family systems, yet research in this area is scarce in low- and middle-income countries like Kenya. An understanding of why fathers drink, consequences of alcohol use, and barriers to care is needed to refine and adapt clinical and implementation approaches to treating fathers.
Methods Community members, leaders, mental health providers, and fathers experiencing alcohol use problems in Eldoret, Kenya were recruited to participate in semi-structured qualitative interviews and focus groups. Participants were asked about why fathers engage in alcohol use, potential impacts of use, and barriers to accessing care. The frame method was employed to analyze the data. The study team read transcripts, iteratively memo-ed and discussed notes, developed a codebook, and coded transcripts. Broad codes were summarized and reviewed alongside transcripts.
Results Participants noted reasons for and consequences of fathers’ drinking at individual, family and interpersonal, and sociocultural levels. At the individual level, alcohol use facilitated an escape from mental distress and acted as a means to cope with “idleness” due to unemployment. Consequences included poor physical and mental health, such as depression. At the family/interpersonal level, fathers used alcohol to distract themselves from family conflicts. Consequences included violence and poor child outcomes. Gender and drinking norms were drivers at the sociocultural level. Consequences at this level included stigmatization and loss of social status, which can drive shame and isolation. Salient barriers to care included fathers’ lack of awareness of their alcohol use problem, limited-service access, and social stigma.
Conclusions Father motivations for drinking are influenced by multiple ecological levels, and drinking has a cascade of consequences on the family. These effects are worsened by barriers to care. Intervention and implementation strategies should consider masculinity norms, resources, and avoidant coping motivations in adaptation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding: This work was supported by the Columbia University Global Mental Health Council Grant (no grant number). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board at New York State Psychiatric Institute (Protocol 8084, Date Approved 29 October 2020) and the Institutional Ethics Review Committee at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (Approval Number 0001138, Date Approved: 10 December 2020)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
Upon reasonable request, deidentified data may be shared.
