Abstract
The sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs of youths in sub-Saharan Africa are not being fully met, as evidenced by high rates of unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections in this population. Understanding service needs and preferences of sub-Saharan African youths aged 10-24 years is critical for improving access and SRH outcomes and the focus of this systematic review of qualitative research. Four databases were searched with key words to identify relevant studies, supplemented by citation search, with an update in June 2023. The eligibility criteria were clear and developed a priori. Twenty included studies from seven countries underwent quality appraisal using CASP. A meta-ethnographic approach was used to synthesise concepts across studies by the researchers. Four key themes were generated: information needs; service needs; social needs; and delivery preferences. Information needs encompassed desires for age-appropriate education on contraception, safer sex, bodily changes, and healthy relationships to fill knowledge gaps. Social needs consisted of life skills training, vocational development, substance use rehabilitation, and support systems to foster healthy behaviours. Service needs included accessible youth-friendly sexual health services, preventative care, sexually transmitted Infections (STI) management, and contraception; and delivery preferences including competent providers who maintain privacy and confidentiality, convenient youth-oriented settings, free or low-cost provisions, and youth involvement in service design. In conclusion, the identified themes emphasise the diverse nature of SRH needs and preferences among sub-Saharan African youths. Insights from their unique priorities and unmet needs inform policy development and intervention strategies. Tailored awareness campaigns, youth-centred training for providers, youth-friendly and confidential SRH models, comprehensive education, and engaging youth in developing relevant solutions may improve acceptability, access, and health outcomes. These efforts could address barriers around stigma, costs, and lack of knowledge, contributing to enhanced SRH and wellbeing. Fulfilling youth SRH needs in sub-Saharan Africa requires commitment across sectors to evidence-based, youth-focused strategies placing their perspectives at the centre
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
As it's a systematic review, data were extracted from only published primary studies
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
We have carefully addressed each point raised by the reviewers and editor and revised the manuscript accordingly. Magnitude of the Problem (Lines 61-67): We clarified that the 374 million new cases of STIs occur globally, with a significant proportion in LMICs, particularly affecting youth in SSA. We also highlighted that approximately 50% of the 21 million pregnancies among 15-19-year-olds in LMICs occur in SSA, emphasizing the region's specific challenges, including gender inequality and its impact on sexual and reproductive health. Exclusion of Grey Literature (Line 124): We provided a more detailed justification for excluding grey literature, acknowledging potential publication bias but highlighting difficulties in comprehensively identifying and accessing these sources. We prioritised published peer-reviewed studies to ensure quality and reliability but recognise that excluding grey literature might introduce some bias. Scoring System in Quality Appraisal (Line 157): We clarified that the scoring system aimed to enhance transparency and consistency in our quality assessments, facilitating inter-study comparisons. No studies were excluded based on scores; all papers were included for their contributions to the meta-ethnographic synthesis. Rationale for Excluding Grey Literature (Lines 213-214): We reiterated our rationale for excluding grey literature, focusing on challenges in comprehensive identification, access, and assessment of scientific quality. Excluding grey literature might introduce some bias, but this approach was necessary to preserve the meta-synthesis's integrity and trustworthiness. Visualisation of Themes and Sub-Themes (Line 234): We replaced the pie chart with a table format to avoid misinterpretation and ensure clarity in representing the findings. Rephrasing for Clarity (Lines 372-373): We revised the statement about guided education to: “Our review suggests that guided education may be associated with the development of healthy sexuality perspectives and potentially protective against risky sexual and reproductive behaviours among youths.” Acknowledgment of Limitations (Line 451): We revised the limitations section to acknowledge the exclusion of grey literature data, which could provide insights into government and institutional responses to significant public health challenges. Regarding the editor's comments, we added a complete ethics statement in the methods section, indicating that no ethical approval was required for this systematic review as it only involved the analysis of published literature. We also moved the funding-related information to the Funding Statement and revised the Acknowledgments section to remove any funding-related text. We hope that our responses and revisions have addressed the concerns and further strengthened our manuscript.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
