Abstract
Autonomic dysfunction is common after spinal cord injury, though differing from motor and sensory function, there are currently no established batteries of tests to comprehensively characterize these deficits. Further, while individual established autonomic tests have a long history and sound scientific background, translating these autonomic testing results to inform clinical understanding is a major barrier. Herein, we outline a battery of six laboratory autonomic tests which were carefully curated to collectively describe the ability of individuals with spinal cord injury to inhibit and recruit sympathetic activity through the injured spinal cord. Presenting normative control data in 23 uninjured individuals completing this testing battery, we further demonstrate the utility of extracting three key testing metrics for each test, comparing these control results to 11 individuals with spinal cord injury. Results demonstrate strong normality of data with testing psychometrics suggesting reliable reproducibility on repeat testing. Further, even in this preliminary sample of individuals with spinal cord injuries, clear differences begin to emerge. This illustrates the ability of this collective testing battery to characterize autonomic regulation after spinal cord injury. To aid in clinical translation, we further present a graphical representation, an autonomic phenotype, which serves as a snapshot of how normal or abnormal sympathetic inhibition and recruitment of activation may be after spinal cord injury. Utilizing these autonomic phenotypes, three example cases of individuals with spinal cord injury highlight evidence of varied degrees of autonomically complete spinal cord injury. Together, this represents a key advancement in our understanding of autonomic function after spinal cord injury.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT04493372
Funding Statement
This study was funded by NIH/NICHD (K23HD102663), with further contributions from the National Center of Neuromodulation for Rehabilitation (P2CHD086844)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institutional Review Board of Mass Gen Brigham gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the study will be made available following publication and subsequent analyses upon reasonable request to the authors.
