RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Characterizing preserved autonomic regulation following spinal cord injury: Methods of a novel concerted testing battery and illustrative examples of a new translationally focused data representation
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.05.31.24308290
DO 10.1101/2024.05.31.24308290
A1 Solinsky, Ryan
A1 Burns, Kathryn
A1 Hamner, Jason W.
A1 Singer, Wolfgang
A1 Taylor, J. Andrew
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/01/2024.05.31.24308290.abstract
AB Autonomic dysfunction is common after spinal cord injury, though differing from motor and sensory function, there are currently no established batteries of tests to comprehensively characterize these deficits. Further, while individual established autonomic tests have a long history and sound scientific background, translating these autonomic testing results to inform clinical understanding is a major barrier. Herein, we outline a battery of six laboratory autonomic tests which were carefully curated to collectively describe the ability of individuals with spinal cord injury to inhibit and recruit sympathetic activity through the injured spinal cord. Presenting normative control data in 23 uninjured individuals completing this testing battery, we further demonstrate the utility of extracting three key testing metrics for each test, comparing these control results to 11 individuals with spinal cord injury. Results demonstrate strong normality of data with testing psychometrics suggesting reliable reproducibility on repeat testing. Further, even in this preliminary sample of individuals with spinal cord injuries, clear differences begin to emerge. This illustrates the ability of this collective testing battery to characterize autonomic regulation after spinal cord injury. To aid in clinical translation, we further present a graphical representation, an autonomic phenotype, which serves as a snapshot of how normal or abnormal sympathetic inhibition and recruitment of activation may be after spinal cord injury. Utilizing these autonomic phenotypes, three example cases of individuals with spinal cord injury highlight evidence of varied degrees of autonomically complete spinal cord injury. Together, this represents a key advancement in our understanding of autonomic function after spinal cord injury.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT04493372Funding StatementThis study was funded by NIH/NICHD (K23HD102663), with further contributions from the National Center of Neuromodulation for Rehabilitation (P2CHD086844)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional Review Board of Mass Gen Brigham gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the study will be made available following publication and subsequent analyses upon reasonable request to the authors.