Abstract
Background and Objectives Cough is a common symptom of respiratory diseases and change in the cough sound can reflect a pathological condition in the lungs. Recent advancement on the analysis of the cough sound has suggested that it has the potential to be used as a non-invasive marker for screening respiratory conditions, such as Asthma, Chronic Pulmonary Obstructive Disease (COPD), Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) and Bronchiectasis. The energy envelope is distinguishable for normal subjects versus subjects with respiratory conditions. Peak analysis of the energy envelope helps in quantifying the feature variation for these conditions.
This study provides the variation of the peak energy features on the Root Mean Square Energy (RMSE) envelope of cough sounds using machine learning tools. Peak properties of energy contours like peak height, peak prominence, base distance (distance between left and right base of a peak) help in quantifying cough patterns.
Methods and Materials Patients presenting with respiratory symptoms to the hospital were recruited to the study. Their cough sounds were recorded through a mobile application. The cough sounds were labeled with corresponding pathologies from spirometry. From every subject three audio recordings were collected before taking a spirometry test. Peak analysis is performed on the features extracted from cough audio signals. Peak features are extracted using the function “scipy.signal.find_peaks” from python’s Scipy library. The comparison of these features are done against the clinical diagnosis which the physician finally arrives at after going through the history, spirometry and radiology as per the standard of practice.
Results The peak analysis in Asthma shows higher base distance and peak height than that of Normal because of prolonged expulsion and airways constriction. The base distance is observed high in Bronchiectasis but peak height and prominence are less when compared with Normal due to loss of elasticity in the airways. Whereas in COPD the base distance and prominence are found to be less than Normal, Asthma and Bronchiectasis which is attributed to multiple narrowing of the glottis. Additionally, the energy peak heights of the cough were observed to be very close due to conditions like excess mucus, airways inflammation, destruction of lung tissue in COPD.
Conclusion Peak analysis of cough provides inferences which can be used as descriptors to differentiate coughs related to respiratory diseases. This study helps us to enhance the performance of Machine Learning models by including the peak energy related features. This peak analysis along with frequency spectral analysis can also be further used in detecting other respiratory conditions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
CTRI/2021/04/032742
Funding Statement
This study is supported by the UK Government (British High Commission, New Delhi). This is a commissioned research report on commercial terms between C-CAMP and the UK Government (British High Commission, New Delhi).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of Christian Medical College gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data availability statement
Due to the nature of this research, participants of this study did not agree for their data to be shared publicly. However, the detailed analysis can be shared by the author “NRS” upon reasonable request.
