Abstract
Personalised Interactive Music Systems (PIMS) are emerging as promising devices for enhancing physical activity and exercise outcomes. By leveraging real-time data and adaptive technologies, PIMS align musical features, such as tempo and genre with users’ physical activity patterns, including frequency and intensity, enhancing their overall experience. This systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of PIMS across physical, psychophysical, and affective domains. Searches across nine databases identified 18 eligible studies, of which six (comprising 17 intervention arms) contained sufficient data for meta-analysis. Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were performed to assess outcomes for physical activity levels, physical exertion, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), and affective valence. Results showed significant improvements in physical activity levels (g = 0.49, CI [0.07, 0.91], p = .02, k = 4) and affective valence (g = 1.68, CI [0.15, 3.20], p = .03, k = 4), with faster music tempo identified as a significant moderator (p = 0.04). No significant effects were observed for RPE (g = 0.72, CI [-0.14, 1.59], p = .10, k = 3) or physical exertion (g = 0.79, CI [-0.64, 2.10], p = .28, k = 5). Substantial heterogeneity and limited study quality indicate the need for more robust, randomised controlled trials to establish the efficacy of PIMS in diverse populations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project has received funding from the Research Council of Finland [346210].
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Figures and page numbers were updated. The Figures were in the incorrect reference style.
Data Availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article [and/or] its supplementary materials accessed here: OSF, https://osf.io/jpy5k/
