Article Information
History
- May 1, 2024.
Article Versions
- You are currently viewing Version 1 of this article (May 1, 2024 - 22:27).
- Version 2 (May 24, 2024 - 07:48).
- View Version 3, the most recent version of this article.
Copyright
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Author Information
- 1Department of Biometry and Data Management, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
- 2Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
- 3Department of Biometry and Data Management, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany & Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
- 4Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany & Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
- ↵*Corresponding author: Ulrike Haug, haug{at}leibniz-bips.de
Posted May 01, 2024.
Misleading and avoidable: design-induced biases in observational studies evaluating cancer screening—the example of site-specific effectiveness of screening colonoscopy
