Cognitive function among former professional male soccer players – the HEADING study

Introduction

Evidence for an association between concussion and poorer cognitive function among participants of contact sports, i.e. where players deliberately or accidentally hit or collide with each other or with inanimate objects, is mounting¹. Despite not being regarded as a contact sport, in association football (soccer) player-to-player contact is unavoidable, including the potential for acute head injury/concussion². Moreover, outfield players not only play with their feet, but they also head the ball, which can reach speeds of 35m/s³, leading to exposure to repetitive sub-concussive head impacts⁴. Therefore, concern over the long-term neurological health and cognitive function of soccer players is increasing.

A few studies have recently addressed this concern, using external (soccer players vs. the general population) or internal (high vs. low exposed to head impacts among soccer players) comparisons¹. In general, soccer players seem to be at increased risk of cognitive decline compared to the general population. A record-linkage analysis of Scottish professional soccer players found a five-fold increase in mortality for Alzheimer’s disease among outfield soccer players (but a weaker association in goalkeepers) compared to the general population (hazard ratio (HR) 5.07; 95% CI, 2.92 to 8.82)⁵. This relative risk was reduced, but remained statistically significant, after also including incident cases identified through clinical records (HR 3.59; 95% CI 1.81 to 4.39)⁶. Another analysis of a sample from the same population found an increased prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases among former soccer players compared to controls⁷. Similarly, an increased risk of Alzheimer disease was reported in a large, nationwide cohort study of Swedish soccer players compared to the general population (HR 1.62; 95% C.I. 1.47 to 1.78)⁸. Mortality from dementia was found to be higher among French soccer players compared to the general population (SMR: 3.38; 95% CI: 2.49 to 4.46) in another large, nationwide study⁹.

The results are less consistent when internal comparisons are conducted. Among Scottish players the risk of dying from dementia increased with increasing length of career⁶, and varied greatly by position played, supporting a possible role of cumulative heading. Conversely, another smaller study conducted in England and Scotland did not find an association between position or length of career and mild cognitive impairment among former soccer players¹⁰. Two other studies recruiting former soccer players from the United Kingdom, with unclear population overlap, found associations between frequency of heading and cognitive impairment^11,12. Conversely, no difference in cognitive performance was found comparing current players and population controls, either among male Brazilian professional soccer players¹³, or among female players, in Europe¹⁴. A systematic review of the short-term effects of heading the ball among soccer players on neurocognitive performance found no statistically significant effects¹⁵. Finally, a human experimental study of controlled heading from goalkeeper kickouts found no cerebrospinal fluid biomarker evidence of neuronal or astroglial injury from the head impacts¹⁶.

The aim of the HEalth and Ageing Data IN the Game of football (HEADING) study was to assess the associations between heading, other impacts to the head, and concussion - separately and in combination - with cognitive function later in life, among former professional soccer players. To do so, a method for assessing exposure to heading and other impacts to the head, based on validated questionnaires and statistical modelling, was developed.

Methods

The HEADING study is a cross-sectional study with a design similar to the previously published BRAIN study which assessed the association between self-reported concussion and cognitive function among former elite rugby players^17,18. In the HEADING study, an additional component assessing the exposure to heading and other impacts to the head, was included¹⁹. The study recruited former professional male soccer players aged 50+ between July 2019 and December 2021. Current and former members of the English Professional Footballers’ Association (PFA)²⁰ were invited to take part into the study by the PFA by post and email (N=1,569), and were sent a remainder by email only (N=192). It was estimated that by recruiting 150 former players, considering that the standard deviations (SDs) of the psychometric tests are in the range of 8%–15% of the absolute value, the study would have more than 95% power to detect a 10% difference, and 80% power to detect a 7% difference in psychometric test scores between exposed and non-exposed participants¹⁷.

Initially, those who agreed to participate were assessed in a clinic in London (N=9), in Manchester (N=14), or at home (N=20). After the COVID-19 restrictions were imposed, assessment was moved online (N=99), after we had conducted a study to confirm the validity of this approach for assessing the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC)²¹. The assessment included questions on soccer playing career, occupational history, lifestyle factors, cognitive ability and self-reported history of concussion¹⁷. At the end of the interview, participants were asked to provide detailed information about their history of heading, other impacts to the head, and concussion while playing and training before, during and after their professional career. Participants who were cognitively impaired were assessed with the assistance of a close family member. All participants signed an informed consent. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (EC/16282). The study protocol can be accessed at https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres-projects-groups/heading-study.

Results

Of the 1,761 invited, 212 (12%) agreed to participate, and 199 (94%) of these were interviewed. Of the 199 interviewed, complete data were available for 142 (71%) participants. During the initial COVID-19 restrictions, some participants were just assessed for the basic demographic information and playing history and were later recalled (once we had conducted the validation study) for the cognitive function testing, but we were not able to successfully recall all of them; similarly some other participants did not provide their playing history but completed all other components. Thus, the final sample for analysis was 199 after MICE imputations were performed. The participants’ demographic and playing characteristics by quartiles of cumulative heading and by categories of concussions are shown in Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1, respectively. The participants had a median age (p25-p75) of 63 years (58-71), and only 41 (29%) of them achieved an A-level or above. The mean (SD) length of their playing career was 17.5 (5.9) years; with 35% being defenders, 18% forwards, 3% goalkeepers, 21% midfielders, and 23% utility players. The findings for the individual tests of the PACC are reported in Supplementary Table 2; PACC scores by quartiles of distribution of heading and concussion categories are shown in Figure 1.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

FIGURE 1:

DISTRIBUTION OF PACC SCORES BY QUARTILES OF DISTRIBUTION OF ESTIMATED CUMULATIVE HEADING (A) AND BY CONCUSSION CATEGORIES (B)

The cumulative lifetime number of headers ranged between 415 and 100,785, with a median (p25-p75) of 28,842 (18,876, 38,397). Heading was associated with length of career (p<0.001) as well as position played (p=0.002) with 42% of the defenders in the highest quartile of heading, and only 19% of the midfielders, 11% of the forwards and none of the goalkeepers in the same category. Overall, little or no association was found between cumulative heading exposure and cognitive function as measured by the PACC, despite an apparent dose-response relationship of decreasing cognitive function with increasing quartiles of heading exposure in unadjusted models (Table 2). No significant differences were found in the associations between heading variables and PACC across playing positions (Table 3).

The cumulative number of impacts to the head (including both head-to-head collisions and blows to head) ranged from 0 to 503 in the sample, with a median (p25-p75) of 64 (26-120). These estimated head impacts were marginally associated with position played (p=0.06) but not with length of career (p=0.29). Overall, no association was found between estimated other head impacts and cognitive function as measured by the PACC (Table 2). However, players in the fourth quartiles of exposure to other head impacts had a significantly lower PACC score compared to those in the first quartile (• = -0.65, 95% C.I. -1.23, -0.07) among forwards only. In the same playing position group, the number of head impacts was negatively associated with PACC scores (• = -0.003, 95% C.I. -0.007, - 0.0002) (Table 3).

A total of 107 (76%) respondents reported at least one soccer-related concussion. Among the concussed, the number of lifetime concussions varied between one and 60, with a median (p25-p75) of 2 (1-4). The number of soccer-related concussions was marginally associated with position played (p=0.09), but not with length of career (p=0.54). The cumulative number of self-reported soccer-related concussions was associated with lower cognitive function as measured by the PACC both in fully adjusted models (• = -0.01; 95% C.I. -0.01, -0.001) and in models additionally adjusting for heading exposure (• = - 0.03, 95% CI (−0.03, -0.001)). When analysed by playing position, the observed number of concussions (continuous) was associated with lower PACC scores among defenders and goalkeepers only (• = -0.02, 95% C.I. -0.04, -0.001) (Table 3). Career length was not associated with measures of cognitive function, except among defenders and goalkeepers (• = -0.03, 95% C.I. -0.07, -0.001) (Table 3).

The sensitivity analysis conducted after excluding imputed values (Supplementary Table 5) and after removing study assessor from the model (results not shown) yielded virtually unchanged results.

Discussion

This is the first study reporting the association of cognitive function with heading a football - based on appropriate modelled exposures estimates - together with other impacts to the head among former male professional soccer players. We do not find a clear association between exposure to heading and cognitive function later in life. However, stronger forms of impacts to the head – those associated with higher levels of acceleration compared to the heading²⁶ – were found to be associated with poorer cognitive function, albeit among forwards only. Soccer-related concussions were found to be associated with poorer cognitive function later in life overall, and particularly among defenders and goalkeepers. It is notable that the latter group rarely, if ever, head the ball, but do suffer from concussions. Taken overall, these results are consistent with an increased risk of poorer cognitive function resulting from more severe impacts. A previous systematic review of the literature suggested that Peak Linear Acceleration (PLA) varied across studies, but was higher overall for other impacts to the head - such as head-to -head collisions - than exposure to heading, in males²⁶. Consistently, impacts leading to neurological symptoms, thus classifiable as concussions, were found at the top 1% by magnitude of PLA among in a study among military and civil volunteers³⁵.

Overall, these findings suggest that there is little or no association between heading the ball and reduced cognitive function. This is consistent with the findings of some previous studies^10,13,14, recently summarised in a systematic review¹⁵. Previous cross-sectional studies that found an association between heading the ball and cognitive function^7,11,12 used various questionnaires to collect data on player exposure characteristics including playing position, with some of the studies also collecting data on the number of headers^11,12. It is unclear, however, how well these were able to capture gaps in playing history due to injury or unemployment. None of these studies attempted to validate their data against the playing career. The only study which relied on a sports database for number of matches during their career was by Rodrigues et al¹³. Here, a validation of the self-reported number of headers per game against observations of currently active players during 42 games was carried out, and this was reassuring, although the results may not apply to recall of subjects who played many decades in the past. The study found no association between exposure to heading and performance on neuropsychological tests¹³.

In our study, we used a questionnaire that was developed, piloted and validated in a group of former professional players. Further validation by comparing the participants recall against available historical records showed that only 6% of the participants incorrectly reported the duration of their playing career and the order of the clubs they had played for (manuscript in preparation). There is a need to also validate the reliability of recall of historic data on the number of headers per game or training session, and it would be advantageous to standardise the relevant questionnaire tools. Moreover, in our study we used quantitative exposure estimates on the cumulative number of head impacts experienced during training and play, derived from empirical exposure modelling approaches. This allowed the assignment of exposure on a group-based level, similar to when implementing Job Exposure Matrices³⁶. Use of group-based exposure assessment approaches limit the potential for bias on the observed associations between exposure and health outcomes due to the introduction of “Berkson error”³⁷. Our regression model estimates, pending some further validation, could be used in other studies, including those already conducted in Scotland⁵, Sweden⁸ and France⁹, if data on playing position, level of play, and duration were available.

Our findings also suggest that exposure to head traumas more severe than heading a ball could be associated with poorer cognitive function later in life. Head-to-head collisions and other blows to the head, were found to be associated with poorer cognitive function, although this was among forwards only, and the possibility of a chance finding (because of multiple subgroup analysis) cannot be ruled out. Soccer-related concussions, on the other hand, were associated with an increased risk of poor cognitive function in the overall sample. Each additional soccer-related concussion was associated with a decrease in cognitive function of about 0.01 SD below the mean PACC score compared to former players of the same age. This is a novel finding, despite the relevant information being collected in some of the previous studies¹¹, but not all¹². This association is consistent with results from other sports such as boxing or American football, where concussion was related to poorer cognitive function^1,38. Importantly, this finding suggests that the previous studies based on external comparison which found a higher incidence or mortality from dementia among soccer players compared to the general population^5,7–9, might – at least partially – be explained by exposures to soccer-related concussions, rather than heading the ball. If further confirmed, this might have important implications in informing the regulation of the game to prevent increasing the risk of dementia. On the other hand, it is important to note that the size of the observed effect per concussion was very small (0.01 SD), and its clinical significance is therefore unclear. Interestingly, the age-adjusted effect estimate was comparable to that previously found among rugby players (• = -0.01, 95% C.I. -0.04, 0.03).

The main limitation of this study is the cross-sectional design, and therefore the potential for recall bias. This was minimized by using appropriate modelled estimation of the exposure to heading, other head impacts, and the BRAIN-Q tool to assess history of concussion²⁸. Selection bias may have arisen from a suboptimal response rate, and because participants with more concussions appear to have been more likely to participate. However, this will not necessarily bias the main study analyses as they involve internal comparisons. Conversely, assuming that our sample may be also biased toward participants with better cognitive function, this may lead to an overestimation of any association between concussion and cognitive function, but any such bias is likely to be small, and unlikely to account entirely for the association found. Unfortunately, it was not possible to estimate pre-morbid intelligence in this study. It is also not possible to exclude that the association between concussion and cognitive function may be modified by some genetic trait, for example, apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype. Finally, no data on depression were collected.

In conclusion, this study does not support an association between heading a ball and poorer cognitive function later in life among former male professional soccer players. However, it does suggest an association between concussion and poorer cognitive function in the same group. This result is consistent with previous studies assessing external comparisons on incidence/mortality of dementia among soccer players and population controls. If further replicated and confirmed, this finding will help to shape policies for reducing the risk of occupationally-related dementia among soccer players.

Data sharing

Pseudonymised data may be made available on request to external researchers for additional analyses meeting the scientific and ethical standards under which the data was collected, and consistent with the overall aims of the project.

If such requests are approved, these additional analyses would be done in collaboration with the study team, and only after approval of the Independent Oversight Committee for the study, and after additional ethical approved, if required.

Availability of data and material

Ms Seghezzo, Dr Williamson and Prof Pearce had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Dr Gallo declares that this manuscript is honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted. All co-authors had full access to the data, and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Funding

This study was funded by a grant from the Drake Foundation (www.drakefoundation. org/) to the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (NP) (EPMSZ06110), with subcontracts to Queen Mary University of London (QMUL) (VG) and the Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM) (DM). All co-authors are co-investigators of the BRAIN Study. SK is employed by the Rugby Football Union as their Medical Services Director.

Authors contributions

Study concept and design: V Gallo, N Pearce, D McElvenny

Analysis and interpretation of data: G Seghezzo, E Williamsons, V Gallo, N Pearce, D McElvenny, I Basinas, S Kemp

Drafting of the manuscript:V Gallo

Data collection: S Mian, D Davoren, D Pearce, Y van der Hoecke

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: G Seghezzo, I Basinas, E Williamson, Y van der Hoecke, S Kemp, S Langan, H Zetterberg, JW Cherrie, DM McElvenny, N Pearce

Conflict of interest statement: HZ has served at scientific advisory boards and/or as a consultant for Abbvie, Acumen, Alector, Alzinova, ALZPath, Amylyx, Annexon, Apellis, Artery Therapeutics, AZTherapies, Cognito Therapeutics, CogRx, Denali, Eisai, Merry Life, Nervgen, Novo Nordisk, Optoceutics, Passage Bio, Pinteon Therapeutics, Prothena, Red Abbey Labs, reMYND, Roche, Samumed, Siemens Healthineers, Triplet Therapeutics, and Wave, has given lectures in symposia sponsored by Alzecure, Biogen, Cellectricon, Fujirebio, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Roche, and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS), which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program (outside submitted work). HZ is a Wallenberg Scholar and a Distinguished Professor at the Swedish Research Council supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (#2023-00356; #2022-01018 and #2019-02397), the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101053962, Swedish State Support for Clinical Research (#ALFGBG-71320), the Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF), USA (#201809-2016862), the AD Strategic Fund and the Alzheimer’s Association (#ADSF-21-831376-C, #ADSF-21-831381-C, #ADSF-21-831377-C, and #ADSF-24-1284328-C), the Bluefield Project, Cure Alzheimer’s Fund, the Olav Thon Foundation, the Erling-Persson Family Foundation, Stiftelsen för Gamla Tjänarinnor, Hjärnfonden, Sweden (#FO2022-0270), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 860197 (MIRIADE), the European Union Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND2021-00694), the National Institute for Health and Care Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, and the UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (UKDRI-1003).