Abstract
Health strategies increasingly emphasize both behavioral and biomedical interventions, yet the complex and often contradictory guidance on diet, behavior, and health outcomes complicates evidence-based decision-making. Evidence triangulation across diverse study designs is essential for establishing causality, but scalable, automated methods for achieving this are lacking. In this study, we assess the performance of large language models (LLMs) in extracting both ontological and methodological information from scientific literature to automate evidence triangulation. A two-step extraction approach—focusing on cause-effect concepts first, followed by relation extraction—outperformed a one-step method, particularly in identifying effect direction and statistical significance. Using salt intake and blood pressure as a case study, we calculated the Convergeny of Evidence (CoE) and Level of Evidence (LoE), finding a trending excitatory effect of salt on hypertension risk, with a moderate LoE. This approach complements traditional meta-analyses by integrating evidence across study designs, thereby facilitating more comprehensive assessments of public health recommendations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the National Key R&D Program for Young Scientists (Project number 2022YFF0712000 to JD) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project number 72074006; 82330107 to JD). We declare no conflicts of interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
authors order and affiliations updated
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
