Abstract
Background The relationships between tumor and its microbiome are still puzzling, with possible bidirectional interactions. Tumor microbiomes may suppress or stimulate tumor growth on the one hand; on the other hand, tumor growth may exert selection pressure on its microbiomes. There is not any consensus on the mode and/or extension of the bidirectional interactions. The objective of this study is to estimate the selection pressure from the primary tumors on tumor microbiomes by comparing with the selection pressure from the solid normal tissues on their corresponding tissue microbiomes across 20+ cancer types.
Methods We apply Sloan near neutral theory and big datasets of tumor tissue microbiomes from the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) databases to achieve the above objective. The near neutral theory model can determine the proportions of above-neutral, neutral and below-neutral species in microbial communities, corresponding with positive, neutral and negative selection pressures from host tissues. By comparing the proportions between the primary tumors and solid normal tissues, we can infer the selection pressure of tumor growth on tissue microbiomes.
Results We find that approximately 65% of species in solid normal tissue microbiomes are neutral, and the proportion is only 40% in the primary tumor microbiomes. In contrast, the proportion of positively selected species exceeds 60% in the primary tumor microbiomes. Furthermore, simulations with neutral theory model reveal that most abundant species are mostly neutral, while non-neutral species are in the long tail of the species abundance distributions.
Conclusions Tumor growth exerts strong positive selection on resident microbiomes, driving the abundances of certain species above the levels expected by the neutral process. Nevertheless, neutral species are still among the most abundant species, suggesting the necessity to pay close attention to the low-abundance or rare species because they are likely to play a critical role in oncogenesis.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
N/A
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Contact Email: ma{at}vandals.uidaho.edu, zhanshanma{at}fas.harvard.edu
