Abstract
Objective To identify imaging subtypes of the cortico-basal syndrome (CBS) based solely on a data-driven assessment of MRI atrophy patterns, and investigate whether these subtypes provide information on the underlying pathology.
Methods We applied Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn), a machine learning algorithm that identifies groups of individuals with distinct biomarker progression patterns, to a large cohort of 135 CBS cases (52 had a pathological or biomarker defined diagnosis) and 252 controls. The model was fit using volumetric features extracted from baseline T1-weighted MRI scans and validated using follow-up MRI. We compared the clinical phenotypes of each subtype and investigated whether there were differences in associated pathology between the subtypes.
Results SuStaIn identified two subtypes with distinct sequences of atrophy progression; four-repeat-tauopathy confirmed cases were most commonly assigned to the Subcortical subtype (83% of CBS-PSP and 75% of CBS-CBD), while CBS-AD was most commonly assigned to the Fronto-parieto-occipital subtype (81% of CBS-AD). Subtype assignment was stable at follow-up (98% of cases), and individuals consistently progressed to higher stages (100% stayed at the same stage or progressed), supporting the model’s ability to stage progression.
Interpretation By jointly modelling disease stage and subtype, we provide data-driven evidence for at least two distinct and longitudinally stable spatiotemporal subtypes of atrophy in CBS that are associated with different underlying pathologies. In the absence of sensitive and specific biomarkers, accurately subtyping and staging individuals with CBS at baseline has important implications for screening on entry into clinical trials, as well as for tracking disease progression.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Wellcome Trust Clinical PhD fellowship (220582/Z/20/Z)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Appropriate ethical approval was acquired through application to each of the individual trial and research ethics committees.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Source data are not publicly available but non-commercial academic researcher requests may be made to the chief investigators of the seven source studies, subject to data access agreements and conditions that preserve participant anonymity. The underlying SuStaIn model code is publicly available at https://github.com/ucl-pond/pySuStaIn44.
