Artificial water fluoridation for dental health improvement: a review and meta-analysis of the evidence and implications of a possible association between water fluoride and IQ

Vickie S. Braithwaite, Ruth A. Valentine, Nicholas J. Wareham
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.24303503

Abstract

Background Globally, dental caries affects 60-90% of schoolchildren. Although artificial water fluoridation improves dental health and reduces dental health inequalities, there is concern that excessive fluoride exposure may lower cognition.

We systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the association between water fluoride and intelligence quotient (IQ).

Methods A literature search of Medline and Web of Science and random-effects meta-analysis comparing mean IQ of children living in low/normal or higher water fluoride areas was investigated. Followed by exploration of possible dose effects among sub-groups, living in moderate (<1.5 ppm) high (1.5-3.0 ppm) or extremely high (>3ppm) water fluoride areas.

Results Twenty-three observational studies (n=9539 children) were included. Overall, the higher water fluoride group had a lower mean IQ compared with the low water fluoride group (standardised mean difference (95% confidence interval): -0.43 (-0.63 to -0.24) p<0.0001, I2=94.2% p<0.0001). Sub-group analysis showed no association between water fluoride and mean IQ in studies of moderate fluoride concentrations (moderate: 0.04 (-0.08 to 0.15) p=0.53, I2=0.0% p=0.68). Mean IQ was lower in the higher water fluoride groups (high: - 0.52 (-0.92 to -0.12) p=0.01, I2=96.2% p<0.00001, extremely high: -0.60 (-0.87 to -0.33), p<0.0001, I2=84.6% p<0.0001).

Conclusions At moderate levels (<1.5 ppm) there was no statistical or clinically meaningful association between water fluoride and IQ. This suggests that populations living in these areas could benefit from artificial water fluoridation without experiencing neurotoxicity. An association between lower mean IQ and high water fluoride observed suggests a need to prioritise removal of excess fluoride from drinking water in these regions.

Key Message (3-5 bullet points in complete sentence) At low concentrations of water fluoride (<1.5 ppm) there was no detectable association between water fluoride and intelligence quotient (IQ);

At high levels of water fluoride concentrations (>1.5 ppm) there was an inverse association between increasing fluoride concentration and decreasing mean IQ;

In countries in which fluoridation of water is considered but kept within safe concentrations, the available evidence suggests that fluoridation has demonstrable benefits on public dental health without any clinically significant effect on IQ.

In countries with excessive groundwater fluoride concentrations there is an imperative to promote water de-fluoridation schemes to protect the public from skeletal and dental fluorosis and from possible neurotoxicity.

Background

Poor dental health in children is of major public health concern. Globally, dental caries are estimated to affect 60-90% of schoolchildren and the vast majority of adults (1) and is the most common non-communicable disease (2). As well as the direct medical costs, ∼US$300 billion spent on dental caries globally per year (2), there are substantial indirect medical and societal costs associated with poor dental health in children include taking time off school, dental pain, decreased attainment in school and loss of parental earnings (3).

Tooth decay is caused by the production of acid from the breakdown of fermentable carbohydrates by bacteria in biofilm on tooth surfaces. This process is exacerbated by dietary factors such as consumption of sugar, acid and carbonated beverages (4) and is strongly associated with deprivation. For example, tooth decay in children living in the most deprived counties in England is almost twice as high compared with children living in the least deprived counties (30% and 16%, respectively)(Figure 1).

Figure 1.
Figure 1. The association between index of multiple deprivation and percentage of children <5 years of age with tooth decay in England, UK.

There was a negative association between index of multiple deprivation (county and unitary authority level data) and % of <5 year olds with tooth decay in England (P<0.0001). 92% of the variation in tooth decay was explained by index of multiple of deprivation. 1 is the most deprived decile and 10 is the least deprived decile. 95% confidence intervals were included in the figure as the error bars. Data to produce this graph was obtained from Public Health England using 2017 data (1). NB. Y-axis starts at 10% for visual clarity.

Fluoride exposure can protect against tooth decay (5). Calcium-hydroxyapatite is the major inorganic component of enamel as well as other hard tissues such as dentine and bone (4). When exposed to acid, calcium-hydroxyapatite dissolves resulting in tooth-softening and decay (4). Fluoride can reduce demineralisation and enhance remineralisation of enamel by displacing calcium and forming fluorine-hydroxyapatite; a compound that is less soluble than calcium-hydroxyapatite (4, 6).

The main methods of ensuring topical exposure of fluoride in many high income countries is through tooth-brushing with fluoride-containing toothpaste and through applying fluoride-varnishes to teeth by dental professionals. Despite these interventions, tooth decay remains a major problem. Many health organisations including Public Health England (PHE), the Centre for Disease and Control and Prevention and the WHO promote artificial water fluoridation as a solution to the problem of poor dental health in regions with low levels of naturally occurring fluoride (1, 7).

The potential benefits of artificial water fluoridation have been long known. Grand Rapids, a city in Michigan, USA was the first city in the world to fluoridate their water supply in the 1940s and to show a dramatic reduction in dental caries following this intervention (8). With artificial water fluoridation, the community water supply is supplemented with a silicofluoride compound. 1.0 ppm (parts per million) of fluoride in water is considered optimal for dental health (9) and 1.5 ppm is considered the maximum upper-limit for overall health (10).

Water fluoridation is an effective primary prevention measure and has been shown to reduce tooth decay in deciduous and permanent teeth by ∼25-35% and to reduce tooth decay-related paediatric hospital admissions by 55% (11-13). Importantly, water fluoridation is a low-agency intervention and as such would be expected to improve overall dental health and can reduce dental health inequalities (14). It has been estimated that ∼370 million people worldwide, in 27 countries are supplied with artificially fluoridated water (15), however, in the UK only 10% of the population has access to naturally (>0.5 ppm) or artificially fluoridated water (16) and this pattern is mirrored in many other European countries

Despite the effectiveness of artificial water fluoridation in improving dental health, there are concerns about the safety of fluoride exposure on health and the ethics of the intervention (17, 18). Fluoride occurs naturally in groundwater but the concentration varies depending on underlying geology (19). Naturally occurring concentrations of groundwater fluoride is typically low across Europe (<0.5 ppm) whereas concentrations >25 ppm have been reported in India, China and Africa (19) where cases of dental and skeletal fluorosis are also seen. Dental and skeletal fluorosis are defined by the incorporation of excessive amounts of fluoride into calcified tissues. Mild dental fluorosis results in cosmetic discolouration of teeth with no other side effects (20), whereas severe dental fluorosis results in dark-brown mottling of teeth, porosity of enamel and increased risk of tooth decay (21). Skeletal fluorosis can lead to an increased fracture risk (22).

However, beyond the skeletal adverse effects of high fluoride exposure, there is growing concern that fluoride exposure in early childhood may act as a neurotoxin and impair cognitive ability as measured by intelligence quotient (IQ) (17).

The aims of this study were to review and meta-analyse the published literature investigating a possible association between water fluoride concentration and IQ and to discuss these findings in the broader context of artificial water fluoridation.

Methods

Search Strategy of the Literature

A literature search was performed of Medline and Web of Science on the 08-January-2020 and inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed together with the study aims prior to performing the literature search (Table 1 and 2). The search, literature review, assessment of study quality and data abstraction was performed by a single reviewer.

View this table:
Table 1. PRISMA flow-diagram of search strategy, search results and studies included in the final meta-analysis.

Assessment of Study Quality

All studies identified in the literature search were observational studies. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies (23) and adapted for cross-sectional studies (24). Studies were scored in three domains: selection, comparability and outcome and were scored out of a maximum of 10 points. Studies with scores >7 were classed as high quality, 5-7 as good and 0-4 as poor.

Statistical Analysis

A random effects meta-analysis model was selected a priori based on the anticipated heterogeneity of studies. The meta-analysis was performed using sample size, mean IQ and standard deviation (or standard error, subsequently converted to standard deviation) (25, 26) of studies assessing the standardised mean difference (SMD) in IQ in children exposed to low/normal concentrations of water fluoride compared with children exposed to higher concentrations of water fluoride. For studies that presented total IQ and a breakdown of IQ (e.g. verbal and performance), total IQ score was used (27, 28). Where studies presented more than two comparator groups i.e. low, moderate and high water fluoride concentrations the moderate groups was selected to compare with the low fluoride group and the high group was excluded; the low to moderate comparison was deemed to be more informative than low to high comparison. (29-33).

The meta-analysis was performed using the STATA programme “metan” and was presented as SMD and 95% confidence interval (CI) and I2 to indicate the extent of study heterogeneity (34). Studies were weighted using study standard deviation (σ) and between study standard deviation (τ; as a measure of study heterogeneity) using the following formula: weight = Embedded Image. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and Egger’s test using the programmes “metafunnel” and “metabias” respectively (35).

Subgroup analysis was performed based on mean fluoride concentration. Studies were categorised as moderate: <1.5 ppm, high: 1.5-3.0 ppm, extremely high: >3.0 ppm or unknown.

Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the effect of outliers on the meta-analysis.

Results

Study Characteristics

Twenty-three studies from five different countries were identified; three were prospective cohort studies from New Zealand (36) and Canada (27, 37) and 20 were cross-sectional studies from China, India and Iran (Table 3)(25, 26, 28-33, 38-49). Data from 9539 children were used and participants were aged 3-14 years. Nineteen of 20 cross-sectional studies compared the IQ of children living in regions with naturally high or low concentrations of groundwater fluoride. The three prospective cohort studies compared the IQ of children living in regions with naturally low concentrations of groundwater fluoride with or without artificial water fluoridation programmes. The mean fluoride concentration in the reference group was ≤1.5 ppm in all studies (range 0.1-1.5 ppm) with the exception of one study with a mean of 2.0 ppm (26). Two studies did not specify fluoride concentration (Table 3)(41, 45). The three prospective cohort studies and one cross-sectional study compared their reference group with a moderate fluoride group (<1.5 ppm) and the remaining 17 cross-sectional studies compared their reference groups with high (1.5-3.0 ppm, n=11 studies) or extremely high (>3.0 ppm, n=6 studies) fluoride groups. Study quality ranged from poor to high quality (2-9) with a median score of 5 (interquartile range: 5-6) (Table 3).

View this table:
Table 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria
View this table:
Table 3. Characteristics and quality of the studies found through the literature search.

Meta-analysis

The meta-analysis estimated a pooled effect of a lower IQ in the high fluoride groups compared with the low fluoride groups; standardised mean difference (95% CI) of -0.43 (- 0.63 to -0.24) p<0.0001 with significant study heterogeneity (I2=94.2% p<0.0001) (Figure 2).

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Random effects meta-analysis of the association between water fluoride and intelligence quotient (IQ)

Random effects meta-analysis of the standardised mean difference (SMD) of intelligence quotient (IQ) in children from the reference group compared with the higher fluoride group. *denotes studies conducted in countries with low concentrations of naturally occurring groundwater fluoride with and without artificial water fluoridation programmes. The remaining studies compared IQ in regions with moderate or high with low concentrations of naturally occurring groundwater fluoride. I-squared was a measure of study heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was performed by categorising studies based on the mean fluoride concentration of their higher fluoride group: moderate (<1.5 ppm, n=4), high (1.5-3.0 ppm, n=11), extremely high (>3.0 ppm, n=6) and unknown (n=2). The concentration of water fluoride in the reference group was <1.5 ppm in all studies (range 0.1-1.5 ppm) with the exception of three studies; one study that had a mean concentration of 2 ppm (26) and two that did not specify water fluoride concentration (41, 45). Overall, mean IQ was significantly lower in the higher fluoride group compared to the reference (SMD (95% CI): -0.43 (-0.63 to -0.24), p<0.0001) and there was substantial study heterogeneity (I-squared: 94.2%, p<0.0001). Subgroup analysis indicated no significant difference in IQ in the moderate fluoride group compared with the reference (0.04 (-0.08 to 0.15), p=0.53) and no study heterogeneity was detected (I-squared: 0.0%, p=0.68). IQ was significantly lower in the high fluoride (-0.52 (-0.92 to -0.12), p=0.01) and extremely high fluoride groups (-0.60 (-0.87 to - 0.33), p<0.0001) compared to the reference and there was substantial heterogeneity (I-squared: 96.2% and 86.6%, p<0.0001 respectively). There was no significant difference in mean IQ in the subgroup of studies with unknown fluoride concentrations (-0.52 (-1.34 to 0.30), p=0.22).

CI: confidence interval, IQ: intelligence quotient, ppm: parts per million, SMD: standardised mean difference.

Subgroup analysis of studies grouped by the fluoride concentration showed no association between water fluoride concentration and IQ in the moderate fluoride group compared with the reference (<1.5 ppm: 0.04 (-0.08 to 0.15) p=0.53) and no study heterogeneity was detected (I2=0.0% p=0.68). IQ was significantly lower in studies with high or extremely high water fluoride concentrations compared with the reference (1.5-3.0 ppm: -0.52 (-0.92 to - 0.12) p=0.01 and >3.0 ppm: -0.60 (-0.87 to -0.33) p<0.0001) (Figure 2) and study heterogeneity was significant (I2=96.2% and 84.6% p<0.0001 respectively).

Bias

Assymmetry of the funnel plot showed evidence of publication bias (Egger’s test p=0.055)(Figure 3). In particular, there was an absence of small studies showing a null or a positive association between water fluoride concentrations and IQ. The funnel plot indicated a clear study outlier (33). When this study was excluded the pooled effect size decreased to - 0.31 (-0.46, -0.14) p<0.0001 and I2 decreased to 91% p<0.0001 (data not shown).

Figure 3.
Figure 3. Assessment of possible publication bias with a funnel plot and Egger’s test.

Studies were grouped by the mean fluoride concentration of their fluoride group: moderate (blue, <1.5 ppm, n=4), high (red, 1.5-3.0 ppm, n=11), extremely high (green, >3.0 ppm, n=6) and unknown (orange, n=2). The Funnel plot indicated a clear outlier study conducted in a region of India with naturally high groundwater fluoride (33). The plot suggested possible publication bias as there was asymmetry in the graph; particularly a lack of studies with higher standard error (i.e. smaller studies) that show a null or a positive association between fluoride concentration and intelligence quotient. Egger’s test for bias was p=0.055. CI: confidence interval, IQ: Intelligence quotient, Pooled: meta-analysis pooled-effect size, ppm: parts per million.

Discussion

The random-effects meta-analysis indicated that, overall, there was a negative statistical association between water fluoride and mean IQ (SMD (95% CI): -0.43 (-0.63 to -0.24), p<0.0001). This finding was based on 23 studies consisting of 9,539 children.

However, at moderate concentrations of water fluoride that were below the considered safe- upper limit (<1.5 ppm), there was no association between water fluoride and mean IQ (0.04 (- 0.08, 0.15), p=0.53). This finding was based on four studies (n=1858 children), three of which were cohort studies that compared IQ in regions with or without artificial water fluoridation programmes in countries with low concentrations of naturally occurring groundwater fluoride (New Zealand and Canada).

In the studies with high (1.5-3.0 ppm) or extremely high (>3.0 ppm) concentrations of water fluoride, there was a significant, negative association between water fluoride and IQ (high: - 0.52 (-0.92, -0.12), p=0.01 and extremely high: -0.60 (-0.87, -0.33), p<0.0001). These finding were based on 17 cross-sectional studies (n=6396 children) that compared IQ in regions with high or low concentrations of naturally occurring groundwater fluoride (China, India and Iran).

While there was evidence to suggest an association between high or extremely high concentrations of naturally occurring water fluoride (≥1.5 ppm) and a lower IQ, there was no statistical evidence of an association between artificial water fluoridation (<1.5 ppm) and IQ in regions with naturally low concentrations of groundwater fluoride.

This is the first meta-analysis investigating the association between water fluoride and IQ to include the three cohort studies comparing IQ in regions with or without artificial water fluoridation programmes (27, 36, 37). Previous meta-analyses only included studies from regions with naturally high concentrations of groundwater fluoride (50). In addition, this meta-analysis attempted to investigate whether the association between water fluoride and IQ depended on fluoride concentration (i.e. moderate, high and extremely high). Crucially, this is the first meta-analysis to suggest that there is no association between moderate concentrations of water fluoride and IQ. Our results are consistent with other meta-analyses suggesting an inverse association between fluoride and IQ when concentrations are high (27, 36, 37).

The studies included in this meta-analysis ranged in quality. The three cohort studies were assessed as being of high quality and the remaining cross-sectional studies were assessed as being of poor or good quality. There was substantial variation in study design, most of the studies were susceptible to bias and confounding and causality was not established. In addition, most of the studies were semi-ecological by design and did not assess individual fluoride exposure through total daily fluoride intake measurements or through biological markers of individual fluoride exposure (e.g. fluoride in urine, blood, hair).

A further weakness was that the subgroup of studies with moderate fluoride concentration (<1.5 ppm) comprised of 1858 participants only. This sample size may have been underpowered to detect a small difference in mean IQ where group differences in fluoride concentrations was also small.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis suggests that water fluoridation at moderate concentrations (<1.5 ppm) was not associated with lower IQ in regions with low concentrations of naturally occurring groundwater fluoride. This suggests that artificial fluoridation in these regions may offer substantial public dental health benefit without any neurotoxic effects although this finding was not based on individual level fluoride exposure. However, there was evidence of an association between water fluoride concentrations and lower IQ in regions with high concentrations of naturally occurring groundwater fluoride (≥1.5 ppm). In such countries, there is an imperative to promote water de-fluoridation schemes to protect the public from skeletal and dental fluorosis and from possible neurotoxicity.

Data Availability

All data produced are available online through a review of the literature

Footnotes

  • Funding: VSB was funded through a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Academic Clinical Fellowship.

  • Conflict of interest statement: None declared

References

  1. 1.↵
    Petersen PE, Lennon MA. Effective use of fluorides for the prevention of dental caries in the 21st century: the WHO approach. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004;32(5):319–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    WHO. Sugars and dental caries 2017 [Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sugars-and-dental-caries.
  3. 3.↵
    Ruff RR, Senthi S, Susser SR, Tsutsui A. Oral health, academic performance, and school absenteeism in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 2019;150(2):111-21.e4.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    Abou Neel EA, Aljabo A, Strange A, Ibrahim S, Coathup M, Young AM, et al. Demineralization-remineralization dynamics in teeth and bone. Int J Nanomedicine. 2016;11:4743–63.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    Wong MC, Clarkson J, Glenny AM, Lo EC, Marinho VC, Tsang BW, et al. Cochrane reviews on the benefits/risks of fluoride toothpastes. J Dent Res. 2011;90(5):573–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Loskill P, Zeitz C, Grandthyll S, Thewes N, Müller F, Bischoff M, et al. Reduced Adhesion of Oral Bacteria on Hydroxyapatite by Fluoride Treatment. Langmuir. 2013;29(18):5528–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    PHE. Improving oral health: a community water fluoridation toolkit for local authorities www.gov.uk: PHE; 2016 [Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/774128/Fluoridation_Toolkit_-_Publications_gateway_version_20160304.pdf.
  8. 8.↵
    Research” NIoDaC. The Story of Fluoride 2008 [Available from: https://www.nidcr.nih.gov/health-info/fluoride/the-story-of-fluoridation.
  9. 9.↵
    Dean HT, Arnold FA, Jr., Jay P, Knutson JW. Studies on mass control of dental caries through fluoridation of the public water supply. Public health reports (Washington, DC : 1896). 1950;65(43):1403-8.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    Directive EUDW. The quality of water indended for human consumption 1998 [Available from: eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:1998:330:0032:0054:EN:PDF.
  11. 11.↵
    McDonagh MS, Whiting PF, Wilson PM, Sutton AJ, Chestnutt I, Cooper J, et al. Systematic review of water fluoridation. BMJ. 2000;321(7265):855-9.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.
    Iheozor-Ejiofor Z, Worthington HV, Walsh T, O’Malley L, Clarkson JE, Macey R, et al. Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(6):276.
  13. 13.↵
    Rugg-Gunn AJ, Do L. Effectiveness of water fluoridation in caries prevention. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012;40 Suppl 2:55–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    McGrady MG, Ellwood RP, Maguire A, Goodwin M, Boothman N, Pretty IA. The association between social deprivation and the prevalence and severity of dental caries and fluorosis in populations with and without water fluoridation. BMC public health. 2012;12:1122.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Whelton HP, Spencer AJ, Do LG, Rugg-Gunn AJ. Fluoride Revolution and Dental Caries: Evolution of Policies for Global Use. J Dent Res. 2019;98(8):837–46.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
  17. 17.↵
    Connett P. 50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation 2012 [Available from: http://fluoridealert.org/articles/50-reasons/.
  18. 18.↵
    Griffin M, Shickle D, Moran N. European citizens’ opinions on water fluoridation. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2008;36(2):95–102.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Kimambo V, Bhattacharya P, Mtalo F, Mtamba J, Ahmad A. Fluoride occurrence in groundwater systems at global scale and status of defluoridation – State of the art. Groundwater for Sustainable Development. 2019;9:100223.
  20. 20.↵
    Pretty IA, Boothman N, Morris J, MacKay L, Liu Z, McGrady M, et al. Prevalence and severity of dental fluorosis in four English cities. Community Dent Health. 2016;33(4):292–6.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    Moller IJ. Fluorides and dental fluorosis. Int Dent J. 1982;32(2):135–47.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Zohoori FV, Duckworth RM. Chapter 44 - Fluoride: Intake and Metabolism, Therapeutic and Toxicological Consequences. In: Collins JF, editor. Molecular, Genetic, and Nutritional Aspects of Major and Trace Minerals. Boston: Academic Press; 2017. p. 539-50.
  23. 23.↵
    Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses www.ohri.ca2019 [Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
  24. 24.↵
    Herzog R, Álvarez-Pasquin MJ, Díaz C, Del Barrio JL, Estrada JM, Gil Á. Are healthcare workers’ intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes? a systematic review. BMC public health. 2013;13(1):154.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Trivedi MH, Sangai NP, Patel RS, Payak M, Vyas SJ. Assessment of groundwater quality with special reference to fluoride and its impact on IQ of schoolchildren in six villages of the Mudra Region, Kachchh, Gujarat, India. Fluoride. 2012;45(4):377–83.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    Trivedi MH, Verma RJ, Chinoy NJ, Patel RS, Sathawara NG. Effect of high fluoride water on intelligence of school children in India. Fluoride. 2007;40(3):178–83.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    Till C, Green R, Flora D, Hornung R, Martinez-Mier EA, Blazer M, et al. Fluoride exposure from infant formula and child IQ in a Canadian birth cohort. Environment International. 2020;134.
  28. 28.↵
    Wang GJ, Yang DL, Jia FG, Wang HQ. A study of the iq levels of four-to seven-year-old children in high fluoride areas. Fluoride. 2008;41(4):340–3.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    Sebastian ST, Sunitha S. A cross-sectional study to assess the intelligence quotient (IQ) of school going children aged 10-12 years in villages of Mysore district, India with different fluoride levels. Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry. 2015;33(4):307–11.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.
    Aravind A, Dhanya RS, Narayan A, Sam G, Adarsh VJ, Kiran M. Effect of fluoridated water on intelligence in 10-12-year-old school children. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry. 2016;6:S237–S42.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.
    Hong FG, Cao YX, Yang D, Wang H. Research on the effects of fluoride on child intellectual development under different environmental conditions. Fluoride. 2008;41(2):156–60.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.
    Wang SX, Wang ZH, Cheng XT, Li J, Sang ZP, Zhang XD, et al. Arsenic and fluoride exposure in drinking water: children’s IQ and growth in Shanyin county, Shanxi province, China. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2007;115(4):643–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    Razdan P, Patthi B, Kumar JK, Agnihotri N, Chaudhari P, Prasad M. Effect of fluoride concentration in drinking water on intelligence quotient of 12u14-year-old children in Mathura District: A cross-sectional study. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry. 2017;7(5):252–8.
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.↵
    Harris R, Bradburn M, Deeks J, Harbord R, Altman D, Sterne J. metan: fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis. Stata Journal. 2008;8(1):3–28.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    Sterne JAC, Harbord RM. Funnel Plots in Meta-analysis. The Stata Journal. 2004;4(2):127–41.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    Broadbent JM, Thomson WM, Ramrakha S, Moffitt TE, Zeng JX, Page LAF, et al. Community Water Fluoridation and Intelligence: Prospective Study in New Zealand. American Journal of Public Health. 2015;105(1):72–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    Green R, Lanphear B, Hornung R, Flora D, Martinez-Mier EA, Neufeld R, et al. Association Between Maternal Fluoride Exposure During Pregnancy and IQ Scores in Offspring in Canada. Jama Pediatrics. 2019;173(10):940–8.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    Chen YX, Han FL, Zhoua ZL, Zhang HQ, Jiao XS, Zhang SC, et al. Research on the intellectual development of children in high fluoride areas. Fluoride. 2008;41(2):120–4.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.
    Eswar P, Nagesh L, Devaraj CG. Intelligence quotients of 12-14 year old school children in a high and a low fluoride village in india. Fluoride. 2011;44(3):168–72.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.
    Karimzade S, Aghaei M, Mahvi AH. Investigation of intelligence quotient in 9-12-year-old children exposed to high- and low-drinking water fluoride in west azerbaijan province, iran. Fluoride. 2014;47(1):9–14.
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    Li YP, Jing XY, Chen D, Lin L, Wang ZJ. Effects of endemic fluoride poisoning on the intellectual development of children in Baotou. Fluoride. 2008;41(2):161–4.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.
    Lu Y, Sun ZR, Wu LN, Wang X, Lu W, Liu SS. Effect of high-fluoride water on intelligence in children. Fluoride. 2000;33(2):74–8.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.
    Mondal D, Dutta G, Gupta S. Inferring the fluoride hydrogeochemistry and effect of consuming fluoride-contaminated drinking water on human health in some endemic areas of Birbhum district, West Bengal. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 2016;38(2):557–76.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.
    Poureslami HR, Horri A, Garrusi B. A comparative study of the iq of children age 7-9 in a high and a low fluoride water city in iran. Fluoride. 2011;44(3):163–7.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    Ren DL, Li KC, Liu DW. A study of the intellectual ability of 8-14 year-old children in high fluoride, low iodine areas. Fluoride. 2008;41(4):319–20.
    OpenUrl
  46. 46.
    Xiang Q, Liang Y, Chen L, Wang C, Chen B, Chen X, et al. Effect of fluoride in drinking water on children’s intelligence. Fluoride. 2003;36(2):84–94.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.
    Yu XC, Chen JW, Li YG, Liu HL, Hou CC, Zeng Q, et al. Threshold effects of moderately excessive fluoride exposure on children’s health: A potential association between dental fluorosis and loss of excellent intelligence. Environment International. 2018;118:116–24.
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.
    Zhang S, Zhang XF, Liu HL, Qu WD, Guan ZZ, Zeng Q, et al. Modifying Effect of COMT Gene Polymorphism and a Predictive Role for Proteomics Analysis in Children’s Intelligence in Endemic Fluorosis Area in Tianjin, China. Toxicological Sciences. 2015;144(2):238–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    Zhao LB, Liang GH, Zhang DN, Wu XR. Effect of a high fluoride water supply on children’s intelligence. Fluoride. 1996;29(4):190–2.
    OpenUrl
  50. 50.↵
    Duan Q, Jiao J, Chen X, Wang X. Association between water fluoride and the level of children’s intelligence: a dose-response meta-analysis. Public Health. 2018;154:87–97.
    OpenUrl
  51. 51.
    Bashash M, Thomas D, Hu H, Martinez-Mier EA, Sanchez BN, Basu N, et al. Prenatal Fluoride Exposure and Cognitive Outcomes in Children at 4 and 6-12 Years of Age in Mexico. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2017;125(9):097017.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.
    Cui YS, Zhang B, Ma J, Wang Y, Zhao L, Hou CC, et al. Dopamine receptor D2 gene polymorphism, urine fluoride, and intelligence impairment of children in China: A school-based cross-sectional study. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2018;165:270–7.
    OpenUrl
  53. 53.
    Das K, Mondal NK. Dental fluorosis and urinary fluoride concentration as a reflection of fluoride exposure and its impact on IQ level and BMI of children of Laxmisagar, Simlapal Block of Bankura District, WB, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2016;188(4).
  54. 54.
    Ding YG, Gao T, Sun H, Han H, Wang W, Ji X, et al. The relationships between low levels of urine fluoride on children’s intelligence and dental fluorosis in endemic fluorosis areas in Hulunbuir, Inner Mongolia, China (vol 44, pg 50, 2011). Fluoride. 2011;44(3):182-.
    OpenUrl
  55. 55.
    Jimenez LV, Guzman ODL, Flores MC, Costilla-Salazar R, Hernandez JC, Contreras YA, et al. In utero exposure to fluoride and cognitive development delay in infants. Neurotoxicology. 2017;59:65–70.
    OpenUrl
  56. 56.
    Khan SA, Singh RK, Navit S, Chadha D, Johri N, Navit P, et al. Relationship Between Dental Fluorosis and Intelligence Quotient of School Going Children In and Around Lucknow District: A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2015;9(11):ZC10-ZC5.
  57. 57.
    Mustafa DE, Younis UM, Elhag SAA. The relationship between the fluoride levels in drinking water and the schooling performance of children in rural areas of khartoum state, sudan. Fluoride. 2018;51(2):102–13.
    OpenUrl
  58. 58.
    Nagarajappa R, Pujara P, Sharda AJ, Asawa K, Tak M, Aapaliya P, et al. Comparative Assessment of Intelligence Quotient among Children Living in High and Low Fluoride Areas of Kutch, India-a Pilot Study. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2013;42(8):813–8.
    OpenUrl
  59. 59.
    Rocha-Amador D, Navarro ME, Carrizales L, Morales R, Calderon J. Decreased intelligence in children and exposure to fluoride and arsenic in drinking water. Cadernos De Saude Publica. 2007;23:S579–S87.
    OpenUrl
  60. 60.
    Sharma P, Singh M, Kumar D, Grover A, Bhardwaj AK. Effect of fluoride exposure through drinking water on the oral health status and intelligence profile of school children of district una, himachal pradesh: an interim analysis. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-Jemds. 2016;5(102):7484-7.
    OpenUrl
  61. 61.
    Soto-Barreras U, Escalante-Villalobos KY, Holguin-Loya B, Perez-Aguirre B, Nevarez-Rascon A, Martinez-Martinez RE, et al. Effect of fluoride in drinking water on dental caries and iq in children. Fluoride. 2019;52(3):474–82.
    OpenUrl
  62. 62.
    Wang MW, Liu L, Li HJ, Li YG, Liu HL, Hou CC, et al. Thyroid function, intelligence, and low-moderate fluoride exposure among Chinese school-age children. Environment International. 2020;134.
  63. 63.
    Xiang QY, Liang YX, Chen BH, Chen LS. Analysis of children’s serum fluoride levels in relation to intelligence scores in a high and low fluoride water village in china. Fluoride. 2011;44(4):191–4.
    OpenUrl
  64. 64.
    Yang YK, Wang XH, Guo XW, Hu PY. The effects of high levels of fluoride and iodine on child intellectual ability and the metabolism of fluoride and iodine. Fluoride. 2008;41(4):336–9.
    OpenUrl
  65. 65.
    Zhao Q, Niu Q, Chen JW, Xia T, Zhou GY, Li P, et al. Roles of mitochondrial fission inhibition in developmental fluoride neurotoxicity: mechanisms of action in vitro and associations with cognition in rats and children. Archives of Toxicology. 2019;93(3):709–26.
    OpenUrl
  66. 66.
    Zhou GY, Tang S, Yan L, Ni Q, Che JW, Xi T, et al. Effects of long-term fluoride exposure on cognitive ability and the underlying mechanisms: Role of autophagy and its association with apoptosis. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 2019;378.
  67. 67.
    Karinnzade S, Aghaei M, Mahvi AH. Iq of 9-12-year-old children in high- and low-drinking water fluoride areas in west azerbaijan province, iran: further information on the two villages in the study and the confounding factors considered. Fluoride. 2014;47(3):266-71.
    OpenUrl
  68. 68.
    Li XS, Zhi JL, Gao RO. Effect of fluoride exposure on intelligence in children. Fluoride. 1995;28(4):189–92.
    OpenUrl
  69. 69.
    Liu SL, Lu Y, Sun ZR, Wu L, Lu WL, Wang XW, et al. Report on the intellectual ability of children living in high-fluoride water areas. Fluoride. 2008;41(2):144–7.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Posted March 19, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Artificial water fluoridation for dental health improvement: a review and meta-analysis of the evidence and implications of a possible association between water fluoride and IQ
Vickie S. Braithwaite, Ruth A. Valentine, Nicholas J. Wareham
medRxiv 2024.03.08.24303503; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.24303503
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area