RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Artificial water fluoridation for dental health improvement: a review and meta-analysis of the evidence and implications of a possible association between water fluoride and IQ
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.03.08.24303503
DO 10.1101/2024.03.08.24303503
A1 Braithwaite, Vickie S.
A1 Valentine, Ruth A.
A1 Wareham, Nicholas J.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/19/2024.03.08.24303503.abstract
AB Background Globally, dental caries affects 60-90% of schoolchildren. Although artificial water fluoridation improves dental health and reduces dental health inequalities, there is concern that excessive fluoride exposure may lower cognition.We systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the association between water fluoride and intelligence quotient (IQ).Methods A literature search of Medline and Web of Science and random-effects meta-analysis comparing mean IQ of children living in low/normal or higher water fluoride areas was investigated. Followed by exploration of possible dose effects among sub-groups, living in moderate (<1.5 ppm) high (1.5-3.0 ppm) or extremely high (>3ppm) water fluoride areas.Results Twenty-three observational studies (n=9539 children) were included. Overall, the higher water fluoride group had a lower mean IQ compared with the low water fluoride group (standardised mean difference (95% confidence interval): -0.43 (-0.63 to -0.24) p<0.0001, I2=94.2% p<0.0001). Sub-group analysis showed no association between water fluoride and mean IQ in studies of moderate fluoride concentrations (moderate: 0.04 (-0.08 to 0.15) p=0.53, I2=0.0% p=0.68). Mean IQ was lower in the higher water fluoride groups (high: - 0.52 (-0.92 to -0.12) p=0.01, I2=96.2% p<0.00001, extremely high: -0.60 (-0.87 to -0.33), p<0.0001, I2=84.6% p<0.0001).Conclusions At moderate levels (<1.5 ppm) there was no statistical or clinically meaningful association between water fluoride and IQ. This suggests that populations living in these areas could benefit from artificial water fluoridation without experiencing neurotoxicity. An association between lower mean IQ and high water fluoride observed suggests a need to prioritise removal of excess fluoride from drinking water in these regions.Key Message (3-5 bullet points in complete sentence) At low concentrations of water fluoride (<1.5 ppm) there was no detectable association between water fluoride and intelligence quotient (IQ);At high levels of water fluoride concentrations (>1.5 ppm) there was an inverse association between increasing fluoride concentration and decreasing mean IQ;In countries in which fluoridation of water is considered but kept within safe concentrations, the available evidence suggests that fluoridation has demonstrable benefits on public dental health without any clinically significant effect on IQ.In countries with excessive groundwater fluoride concentrations there is an imperative to promote water de-fluoridation schemes to protect the public from skeletal and dental fluorosis and from possible neurotoxicity.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced are available online through a review of the literature