Abstract
This paper examines the differential impacts of early childhood exposure to air pollution on children’s health care use across parental income groups and vulnerability factors using French administrative data. Our quasi-experimental study reveals significant impacts on emergency admissions and respiratory medication in young children, attributed to air pollution shocks from thermal inversions. Using causal machine learning, we identify these health impacts as predominantly affecting 10% of infants, characterized by poor health indicators at birth and lower parental income. Our results suggest that intervention strategies focusing on vulnerability metrics may be more effective than those based solely on exposure levels.
JEL Codes: I14, I18, Q53, Q58
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche through the program Investissements d'Avenir ANR-17-EURE-0001 - Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The data collection and transmissions for the EDP-Sante to the DREES (Statistical Body of the French Ministry of Solidarity and Health) were approved by the French Data Protection Authority (CNIL) for the project of evaluation of the French National Health Strategy (Strategie Nationale de Sante), which comprises answers to environmental hazards such as air pollution. The DREES is allowed to process personal health data in order to compute statistics, under article 65 of the law Data processing and Liberties (Informatique et Libertes) of January 6th, 1978. All data processing and storage comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵34 Neither the European Commission nor the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) bears responsibility for the use of Copernicus data in this report.
↵35 For instance, the point estimate 0.007 for outcome 4 in column (2) in Table 3 when multiplied by 1/0.12 equals to 0.058, which is statistically close to 0.057, the corresponding estimate in the fifth row and first column of Table B3, and equates 0.029 when multiplied by 1/0.24 whereas the corresponding estimate in B3 is 0.024.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
