Abstract
Objective To analyze the safety and efficacy of different direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs) compared to warfarin in patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and valvular disease or concomitant AF and chronic kidney disease (CKD).
Methods We conducted literature searches in MEDLINE, Embase, and EBM Reviews to examine randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs that included the aforementioned patient populations treated with warfarin or DOAC (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, or edoxaban) and assessed outcomes of bleeding, stroke, or systemic/arterial thromboembolism. Meta-analysis was performed for eligible studies using the Mantel-Haenszel method random-effects model.
Results 3,172 studies were screened and 154 studies were selected after two levels of screening. Meta-analysis showed that, in patients with concomitant AF and CKD, DOAC was associated with reduced bleeding in non-RCTs (OR 0.65, 95% Cl [0.49, 0.86], p=0.003), particularly in more severe CKD (eGFR < 60mL/min/1.73m2). Apixaban in particular was associated with reduced bleeding (OR 0.52, 95% Cl [0.44, 0.63], p<0.00001) and stroke incidence (OR 0.60, 95% Cl [0.41, 0.87], p=0.007). In patients with concomitant AF and valvular disease, DOAC was associated with reduced bleeding (OR 0.75, 95% CI [0.57, 0.97], p=0.03) and stroke incidence (OR 0.66, 95% CI [0.47, 0.93], p=0.02) in non-RCTs.
Conclusion Our study studied populations that are typically excluded from large-scale anticoagulation studies and our findings suggest that DOACs may be superior to warfarin both in the prevention of thromboembolic event and in the reduction of bleeding risks in patients with concomitant CKD or valvular disease.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
