Combined multiplex panel test results are a poor estimate of disease prevalence without adjustment for test error
View ORCID ProfileRobert Challen, View ORCID ProfileAnastasia Chatzilena, View ORCID ProfileGeorge Qian, Glenda Oben, View ORCID ProfileRachel Kwiatkowska, View ORCID ProfileCatherine Hyams, View ORCID ProfileAdam Finn, View ORCID ProfileKrasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova, View ORCID ProfileLeon Danon
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.14.23299860
Robert Challen
1Bristol Vaccine Centre, Schools of Population Health Sciences and of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2Department of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Anastasia Chatzilena
1Bristol Vaccine Centre, Schools of Population Health Sciences and of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2Department of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
George Qian
1Bristol Vaccine Centre, Schools of Population Health Sciences and of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2Department of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Glenda Oben
1Bristol Vaccine Centre, Schools of Population Health Sciences and of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2Department of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Rachel Kwiatkowska
3Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, UK
4NIHR Health Protection Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, UK
Catherine Hyams
1Bristol Vaccine Centre, Schools of Population Health Sciences and of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Adam Finn
1Bristol Vaccine Centre, Schools of Population Health Sciences and of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova
5Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Exeter, UK
Leon Danon
1Bristol Vaccine Centre, Schools of Population Health Sciences and of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2Department of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Article usage
Posted December 15, 2023.
Combined multiplex panel test results are a poor estimate of disease prevalence without adjustment for test error
Robert Challen, Anastasia Chatzilena, George Qian, Glenda Oben, Rachel Kwiatkowska, Catherine Hyams, Adam Finn, Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova, Leon Danon
medRxiv 2023.12.14.23299860; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.14.23299860
Combined multiplex panel test results are a poor estimate of disease prevalence without adjustment for test error
Robert Challen, Anastasia Chatzilena, George Qian, Glenda Oben, Rachel Kwiatkowska, Catherine Hyams, Adam Finn, Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova, Leon Danon
medRxiv 2023.12.14.23299860; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.14.23299860
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Addiction Medicine (383)
- Allergy and Immunology (699)
- Anesthesia (193)
- Cardiovascular Medicine (2858)
- Dermatology (244)
- Emergency Medicine (431)
- Epidemiology (12567)
- Forensic Medicine (10)
- Gastroenterology (807)
- Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4439)
- Geriatric Medicine (402)
- Health Economics (716)
- Health Informatics (2854)
- Health Policy (1050)
- Hematology (376)
- HIV/AIDS (893)
- Medical Education (414)
- Medical Ethics (114)
- Nephrology (464)
- Neurology (4200)
- Nursing (222)
- Nutrition (617)
- Oncology (2205)
- Ophthalmology (626)
- Orthopedics (254)
- Otolaryngology (319)
- Pain Medicine (269)
- Palliative Medicine (83)
- Pathology (488)
- Pediatrics (1172)
- Primary Care Research (483)
- Public and Global Health (6786)
- Radiology and Imaging (1493)
- Respiratory Medicine (901)
- Rheumatology (430)
- Sports Medicine (369)
- Surgery (473)
- Toxicology (57)
- Transplantation (202)
- Urology (174)