ABSTRACT
Patient data comprises of different modalities like clinical notes, lab results, and radiological investigations. Predictive modeling on this patient data is challenging due to the heterogeneity among patients and modalities captured, such as no ECG recordings for a few patients. Ensuring model applicability to all admitted patients requires addressing three key factors: i) handling modalities at disparate time-scales (e.g., once in a few hours medication and 125 Hz ECG need to be handled by same model), ii) handling missing modality (e.g., ECG not recorded), and iii) modeling temporal interactions between modalities over time (e.g., the ECG fluctuation triggered some lab test order). Existing literature often doesn’t simultaneously address these requirements. Therefore, we propose a novel patient representation approach inspired by clinical workflows, representing each patient as a graph. We categorize patient data into two main components: observations and care team actions, allowing cross-modality temporal interaction when actions consider the previous observations. We define observation nodes to capture modality-specific data within the time between two actions, and action nodes capture data of the actions undertaken, with edges to capture the temporal dependencies. To address missing modalities and time-scale disparities, we define node types for different modalities and use modality-specific representation for the nodes; implying a missing modality is equivalent to a missing node type in the graph. Aligned with clinical workflows, this patient-graph representation aims to enhance the practicality of predictive systems for various healthcare tasks, from mortality risk assessment to medication recommendations, thereby improving clinical decision support.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund [A-8000874-00-00], PI: VR
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The collection of patient information and creation of the research resource was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, who granted a waiver of informed consent and approved the data-sharing initiative.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
suparna.g{at}u.nus.edu
vaibhav.rajan{at}nus.edu.sg