Abstract
Background Retraction is the process of correcting literature and warning readers of publications that contain such serious flaws or erroneous data. A variety of reasons may lead to retraction of published articles.
Objectives This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of retracted articles from Iran in the field of health sciences.
Design Retrospective study
Setting This study was conducted on retracted articles in the field of health published by authors affiliated with Iranian organizations from 2001 to 2022. The Retraction Watch Database was used to extract the information from these articles. The following information was extracted: journal name, article type, institutions, country(s), date published, date retracted, authors number, and reasons for retraction. This data was evaluated using descriptive statistics.
Results Between 2001 and 2022, our search identified 348 retracted articles. The highest number of retractions belongs to Diagnostic Pathology and Tumor Biology journals. The highest numbers of retractions belong to 2016 and 2020, respectively. The highest number of retracted articles were published in 2015 and 2018, respectively. Different types of articles have been assigned different percentages: Research article (52.9%), clinical study (29.9%), conference abstract/paper (5.2%), review article (4.6%), case report (3.7%), and others (3.7%). The main reasons that led to retraction were investigation by journal/publisher, fake peer review, and concerns/issues about data. Malaysia, Bahrein, and India had the most cooperation with Iran in the retracted articles. The mean time between publication and retraction was 2.44 years and ranged between less than a year and 16 years. Institutions with the highest record of retraction are Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, and Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.
Conclusions Investigation by journal/publisher, fake peer review, and concerns/issues about data were the most common reasons for retraction. The results of this study indicate that more attention is required from research ethics authorities in order to protect the integrity of published research.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Isfahan university of medical sciences
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
List of abbreviations
- (COPE)
- Committee On Publication Ethics
