Abstract
Purpose Baseline genomic data have not demonstrated significant value for predicting the response to MAPK inhibitors (MAPKi) in patients with BRAFV600-mutated melanoma. We used machine learning algorithms and pre-processed genomic data to test whether they could contain useful information to improve the progression-free survival (PFS) prediction.
Experimental design This exploratory analysis compared the predictive performance of a dataset that contained clinical features alone and supplemented with baseline genomic data. Whole and partial exon sequencing data from four cohorts of patients with BRAFV600-mutated melanoma treated with MAPKi were used: two cohorts as training/evaluation set (n = 111) and two as validation set (n = 73). Genomic data were pre-processed using three strategies to generate eight different genomic datasets. Several machine learning algorithms and one statistical algorithm were employed to predict PFS. The performance of these survival models was assessed using the concordance index, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Brier score.
Results The cross-validated model performance improved when pre-processed genomic data, such as mutation rates, were added to the clinical features. In the validation dataset, the best model with genomic data outperformed the best model with clinical features alone. The trend towards improved prediction with baseline genomic data was maintained when data were censored according to the two clinical setting scenarios (duration of clinical benefit and progression before 12 months).
Conclusion In our models, baseline genomic data improved the prediction of response duration and could be incorporated into the development of predictive models of response pattern to MAPKi in melanoma.
Translational Relevance Currently, biomarkers are lacking to robustly predict the response to therapy targeting the MAPK pathway in advanced melanoma. Therefore, in the clinic, a trial-and-error approach is often used. Baseline genomic mutation profiles represent a comparably stable biological readout that is easily accessible and measurable in clinical routine. Therefore, they might represent candidate predictive biomarker signatures. However, previous studies could not show a clear predictive signal for the response to MAPK inhibitors (MAPKi) in patients with BRAFV600-mutated melanoma. Here, our exploratory machine learning-based analysis highlighted an improved prediction of progression-free survival when clinical and genomic data were combined, even when using only partial exome sequencing data. This suggests that baseline genomic data could be incorporated in the development of predictive models of the response to MAPKi in advanced melanoma by leveraging the results of current routine partial exome sequencing.
Interest statement The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work has been supported by the INCa-Canceropole GSO (Programme Emergence Intelligence Artificielle #2022/IA20 and Programme Emergence #2018/E1), the Fondation ARC pour la recherche sur le cancer (Projets ARC 2022 PJA2 #ARCPJA2022060005107), and the Ligue nationale contre le cancer (Comite du Gard JPB/GA/MV/39/2019). SD is supported by the Agence nationale pour la recherche (Intelligence Artificielle en Sante et Environnement / AXIAUM #ANR/20/THIA/0005/01) and the University of Montpellier/Ecole Doctorale CBS2.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics Committee of the University of Montpellier (France): favorable advice UM 2022-009bis
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.