Abstract
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased their potential in diverse language tasks, their application in the healthcare arena needs to ensure the minimization of diagnostic errors and the prevention of patient harm. A Medical Knowledge Graph (KG) houses a wealth of structured medical concept relations sourced from authoritative references, such as UMLS, making it a valuable resource to ground LLMs’ diagnostic process in knowledge. In this paper, we examine the synergistic potential of LLMs and medical KG in predicting diagnoses given electronic health records (EHR), under the framework of Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). We proposed a novel graph model: Dr.Knows, that selects the most relevant pathology knowledge paths based on the medical problem descriptions. In order to evaluate Dr.Knows, we developed the first comprehensive human evaluation approach to assess the performance of LLMs for diagnosis prediction and examine the rationale behind their decision-making processes, aimed at improving diagnostic safety. Using real-world hospital datasets, our study serves to enrich the discourse on the role of medical KGs in grounding medical knowledge into LLMs, revealing both challenges and opportunities in harnessing external knowledge for explainable diagnostic pathway and the realization of AI-augmented diagnostic decision support systems.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by NIH. YG was supported by NIH/NLM K99LM014308 and DD, MA were supported by R01LM012973. TM was supported by R01LM012973. MC was supported by NHLBI R01HL157262. EC was supported by the Computation and Informatics in Biology and Medicine Training Program (NLM 5T15LM007359).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Minimal Risk Research IRB of University of Wisconsin gave ethical approval of this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Updated the funding acknowledgement for it to be standard format.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
